Laserfiche WebLink
Also, Chair Stenlund suggested fine-tuning language related to appropriate terms <br /> and expectations for universal clean-up of spills or leaks that may end up in the <br /> city's gutter lines by defining what they meant by "clean-up, including how and <br /> when they would address those spills. Chair Stenlund noted that this area tied <br /> directly to the City's MS4 permit. <br /> Chair Stenlund also suggested clear language that the contactor, their employees, <br /> or subcontractors did not smoke in garages; and wherever "No Smoking" signs <br /> are in evidence, they comply with that. <br /> Specific to collection zones, Chair Stenlund reiterated the potential dividing of the <br /> park zone; and asked that staff review the draft RFP for areas or zoned (Section <br /> 5.08) to make it clearer. <br /> Chair Stenlund noted the need to spell out MRF the first time it was used in the <br /> draft RFP. <br /> Chair Stenlund expressed his appreciation that the annual recommendations to the <br /> City Council come through the vendor and PWETC to further discussion actions <br /> taken by a vendor to reduce their carbon footprint as well as that of the city; and <br /> as a way to inform future best management practices. <br /> To that point, Mr. Culver noted that the best part of the Best Value Process <br /> scoring was recognizing those additional standards proposed by a vendor and <br /> rewarding them for those extra efforts. <br /> Section 6.07 —Annual Work Plan (page 28) <br /> Chair Stenlund opined that he found the first sentence somewhat awkward, and <br /> asked that staff review that as well as Section 6.08 (Outreach to Low Participating <br /> Communities) to make sure there was consistency in what was being addressed. <br /> Chair Stenlund noted in Section 6.08 specifically the need to be consistent with <br /> the terminology of"Best Value Plan," Value Added Plan," or "Best Value <br /> Process" throughout the RFP. <br /> Chair Stenlund also noted the reference to the "annual work plan" in Sections <br /> 6.07, 6.08 and 6.09 needing consistency as well. <br /> In Section 7.01 —Processing Facilities Must Be Specified (page 28), Chair <br /> Stenlund again asked that MRF be spelled out the first time it was referenced. <br /> Chair Stenlund noted the changes made by staff in Section 8.05 —Liquidated <br /> Damages (page 34 —35)based on Member Cihacek's comments at the last <br /> meeting and whether that language was clearer. <br /> Page 16 of 20 <br />