My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-02-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-02-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2016 10:14:19 AM
Creation date
3/28/2016 10:14:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/23/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Cihacek opined that his concern was that in not having that piece of the <br /> information and process, it wasn't allowing him to do his job of engagement and <br /> information processing as part of his decision-making on the PEWTC and <br /> subsequent recommendation to the City Council. <br /> Chair Stenlund noted that it was up to the PWETC majority. <br /> Member Cihacek suggested a subcommittee of the PWETC review the proposals. <br /> If the majority decided to pursue this option, Chair Stenlund advised that he <br /> would support the full PWETC reviewing the proposals versus a subcommittee. <br /> Members Thurnau, Seigler and Heimerl agreed that if the PWETC was to be <br /> involved in reviewing the proposals that it be done by the entire PWETC as a full <br /> commission. <br /> Member Cihacek reiterated that he was happy to let the City Council make a <br /> determination as to whether or not the PWETC should be involved or if it should <br /> be left at the discretion of staff Member Cihacek opined that the PWETC didn't <br /> need to make that decision, but his interest was in presenting the argument to the <br /> City Council, and let the public and City Council speak to it; with staff advising <br /> the commission of the City Council's subsequent decision. <br /> Member Seigler opined that staff should perform the review; reiterating that he <br /> didn't want to be involved as a group or individually; and agreed that staff should <br /> be left alone to do their job. <br /> Motion <br /> Member Cihacek moved, Member Wozniak seconded, recommending to the City Council <br /> that they accept the RFP as revised. <br /> Ayes: 6 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 7. Review March 2016 Meeting <br /> • Mr. Culver advised that the Lake Owasso private drive storm sewer project <br /> was an item the PWETC needed to address next month, with the potential for <br /> a possible assessment and recommendation of the PWETC to the City Council <br /> accordingly. <br /> • Community Solar (tentatively scheduled) <br /> However, Mr. Culver suggested a field trip in honor of Chair Stenlund's last meeting, <br /> including a tour of the Upper Villa Re-Use System and Corpus Christi Basin, and if time <br /> allowed, possibly another stormwater-related project: the St. Croix Lift Station <br /> Rehabilitation. <br /> Page 19 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.