Laserfiche WebLink
the broad discretion of the City in making this kind of land use decision, arecommendation to <br />76 <br />deny should be supported by specific findings of fact based on the Planning Commission’s <br />77 <br />review of the application, applicable City Code regulations, and the public record. <br />78 <br />By motion, make a recommendation to approve or denythe proposedrezoning of the <br />79 <br />property at 2025 County Road B from LDR-1to HDR-1 <br />, based on the comments and findings <br />80 <br />of this report,public input, and the Commission’s recommendation about the requested CPA. <br />81 <br />AA <br />LTERNATIVE CTION <br />82 <br />Pass a motion to table the requestfor future action. <br />If the Planning Commission wishes to <br />83 <br />have additional information, such asanalysis of the potential traffic impacts of a 54-unit <br />84 <br />apartment in light of the existing traffic and roadway infrastructure, discussion of the request can <br />85 <br />be tabled to allow the applicant time to prepare such information. Tabling beyond January 31, <br />86 <br />2016may require extension of the 60-day action deadline establishedin Minn. Stat. §15.99. <br />87 <br />Attachments:A:Area mapOpen house materialsand concept plans <br />C: <br />Aerial photoPublic comment <br />B:D: <br />Prepared by:SeniorPlanner Bryan Lloyd <br />651-792-7073 <br />bryan.lloyd@cityofroseville.com <br />PF16-001_RPCA_010616 <br />Page 4of 4 <br /> <br />