My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-04-06_PC_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Agendas
>
2016-04-06_PC_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2016 4:33:43 PM
Creation date
4/8/2016 4:33:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning CommissionMeeting <br />Minutes –Wednesday, March 2, 2016 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />Wheaton Avenue, a 28’ wide street, were there any concerns with driveway size and <br />350 <br />cutting off parking along one side; and whether it would allow adequate on-street parking <br />351 <br />for residents and visitors. <br />352 <br />Mr. Knaeble advised that, based on their experience, they prefer parking on one side as <br />353 <br />opposed to both, creating a safer and more predictable environment for neighbors and <br />354 <br />children.However, Mr. Knaeble opined that the 28’ width would be safer with that <br />355 <br />reduced area than might be typically seen in other developments. <br />356 <br />Based on his engineering practice, Member Daire asked Mr. Knaeble how much space <br />357 <br />was needed from curb to curb for on-street parking, with Mr. Knaeble responding typically <br />358 <br />8’ in width.Given two 10’ drive lanes, Member Daire further asked if there were any <br />359 <br />concerns with the opposite curb line.Mr. Knaeble stated that from the face of the curb to <br />360 <br />face of opposite curb, a 28’ wide street was designed for drainage and gutter driving if <br />361 <br />necessary.From their experience, Mr. Knaeble stated that a lot of western metropolitan <br />362 <br />suburbs had residential parking on both sides on 28’ wide streets as a normal standard. <br />363 <br />Mr. Knaeble stated that with parking only on one side, he anticipated no problems; as <br />364 <br />long as signed accordingly and still allowing two vehicles to pass safely. <br />365 <br />Public Comment <br />366 <br />As previously noted, written comment was received from Dawn Loven, 686 W County <br />367 <br />Road C, speaking in opposition to the proposed rezoning. <br />368 <br />Marge Dettling, 693 Wheaton Avenue <br />369 <br />Ms. Dettling opined that a narrow street created more confusion, nor did she find it very <br />370 <br />safe.With additional homes yet to be constructed on Dale Street and so close to the <br />371 <br />corner, Ms. Dettling further opined that there would be no place for snow storage, <br />372 <br />especially at that busy corner.If snow builds up, Ms. Dettling asked if parking would be <br />373 <br />allowed onDale Street. <br />374 <br />Regarding a curved street, Ms. Dettling opined that it would be much more costly than a <br />375 <br />straight street; and if looking further down Wheaton Avenue, there was only one small <br />376 <br />curve, and she thought a straight street from the existing dead-end to Dale Street would <br />377 <br />be more appropriate and fit in better aesthetically from her perspective. <br />378 <br />Member Murphy clarified that Ms. Dettling would prefer the street to go straight through to <br />379 <br />Dale Street and be just as wide.When Member Daire suggested the curves may help <br />380 <br />keep speed down; Ms. Dettling responded that she didn’t see speeding a problem if the <br />381 <br />road was straight and if there was to be a curve, she would prefer it the same width as <br />382 <br />the current street. <br />383 <br />At the request of Chair Boguszewski, Mr. Paschke advised that Wheaton Avenue was 32’ <br />384 <br />wide from curb to curb, making a 4’ difference in the 28’ proposed width for this segment, <br />385 <br />with the existing segment currently allowing for parking on both sides. <br />386 <br />Regarding parking on Dale Street, Chair Boguszewski noted that parking was controlled <br />387 <br />by the Roseville Public Works Department, with Mr. Knaeble clarifying that parking was <br />388 <br />currently allowed on Dale Street on the west side adjacent to existing homes and advised <br />389 <br />that this proposal wouldn’t change that. <br />390 <br />Chelsea Evler,684 Iona <br />391 <br />As the parent of young children, Ms. Evler expressed concern with having to undergo the <br />392 <br />noise of construction over the next three years, opining that it would be loud, disruptive <br />393 <br />and take away from their neighborhood and their property values.Ms. Evler stated her <br />394 <br />preference that the southeast area of this property be built into a park, with homes in the <br />395 <br />area moving toward younger families with children.Ms. Evler opined that it would be nice <br />396 <br />to have a park in the neighborhood rather than McMansions towering over existing <br />397 <br />homes.Ms. Evler stated her objection to this proposed development. <br />398 <br />In driving down Wheaton Avenue, Member Daire noted his observance of a well-beaten <br />399 <br />path leading off the cul-de-sac. <br />400 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.