Laserfiche WebLink
noncompliant to §1017.14 of the City Code, reduces existing impacts, supports greater private <br />90 <br />open/green area, offers greater development flexibility, and reduces potential impact on the <br />91 <br />public water (Lake Owasso). <br />92 <br />Roseville’s Development Review Committee (DRC) met on October 15, 2015, to discuss this <br />93 <br />application and indicated that the proposal was a much better option than the existing scenario <br />94 <br />and that it did not seem fair or appropriate to require compliance when the property owner <br />95 <br />currently could develop the two 37+ foot lots of record with single family homes. <br />96 <br />PC <br />UBLICOMMENT <br />97 <br />At the time this report was prepared, Planning Division staff has not received any <br />98 <br />communications from the public about the variance request. <br />99 <br />As required by Chapter 1017, The Planning Division mailed notice on October 20, 2015, to the <br />100 <br />Department of Natural Resources (DNR). At this time no comments have been received. <br />101 <br />RA <br />ECOMMENDEDCTION <br />102 <br />Adopt Variance Board Resolution 117 <br />approving a variance to §11.03.06.H and a 25-foot <br />103 <br />variance to §1017.14 of the City Code to allow the creation of a 75-foot-wide residential parcel <br />104 <br />of land, generally addressed as 375 South Owasso Boulevard, based on the comments and <br />105 <br />findings outlined in this report, subject to the following condition: <br />106 <br />a. <br />Approval of a Minor Subdivision – Recombination - consistent with the lot survey used <br />107 <br />for the Variance process. <br />108 <br />b. <br />The residual portion of land referred to as Parcel B be combined with the adjacent parcel <br />109 <br />addressed as 365 South Owasso Boulevard. <br />110 <br />AA <br />LTERNATIVECTIONS <br />111 <br />Pass a motion to table one or more of the items for future action. <br /> Tabling beyond November <br />112 <br />29, 2015, will require an extension of the 60-day action deadline established in Minn. Stat. <br />113 <br />§15.99 <br />114 <br />Adopt a resolution to deny the requested approval. <br /> Denial should be supported by specific <br />115 <br />findings of fact based on the Variance Board’s review of the application, applicable zoning or <br />116 <br />subdivision regulations, and the public record. <br />117 <br />NS <br />EXT TEPS <br />118 <br />The decision of the Variance Board is final unless an appeal is filed. The appeal period remains <br />119 <br />open for 10 days from the date of the decision, and an appeal may be made either by the <br />120 <br />applicant or by another Roseville property owner. <br />121 <br />An appeal must be submitted in writing to the City Manager by noon on November 16, 2015, for <br />122 <br />a hearing before the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. <br />123 <br />Prepared by: City Planner Thomas Paschke - 651-792-7074 | thomas.paschke@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />Attachments: A: Area map Proposed survey <br />C: <br />Aerial photo Draft resolution <br />B:D: <br />PF15-021_RVBA_110415 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br />