Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment D <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />VARIANCE BOARD OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the <br />th <br />Variance Board of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, on the 7 day of <br />October, 2015, at 5:30 p.m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following members absent: <br />Variance Board Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />VB RESOLUTION NO. 116 <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES TO §1010.03.C.4 (PROHIBITED SIGNS) <br />AND §1010.03.C.8 OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE AT 1705 HIGHWAY 36, <br />ROSEDALE MALL #668, ROJO MEXICAN GRILL (PF15-020) <br />WHEREAS, City Code §1010.03.C.4 (Prohibited Signs) states: No sign shall extend <br />above the roof line of a building (roof sign); and <br />WHEREAS, City Code §1010.03.C.8 reads: The following specific signs shall be <br />prohibited: off-site, flashing, mobile/portable, roof, rotating, and painted signs, banners and <br />billboards; and <br /> WHEREAS, Rojo Mexican Grill, proprietor locating in Rosedale Mall #668 (former <br />Romano’s Macaroni Grill) desires to install a wall sign that would extend above the parapet wall <br />height of their tenant space; and <br />WHEREAS, the portion of Rosedale Mall where Rojo Mexican Grill will locate is legally <br />described as: <br />PIN: 09-29-23-42-0007 <br />Lot 3, Block 1, Rosedale Center Fourth Addition <br />WHEREAS, City Code §1009.04 (Variances) establishes the purpose of a is <br />VARIANCE <br />“to permit adjustment to the zoning regulations where there are practical difficulties applying to <br />a parcel of land or building that prevent the property from being used to the extent intended by <br />the zoning;” and <br />WHEREAS, the Variance Board has made the following findings: <br />a. <br />The code-compliant manner in which to meet the requirements of §1010.03.C.4 <br />(Prohibited Signs) and §1010.03.C.8 has been determined to be overly-burdensome <br />for this situation. Such limitations/restrictions represent the practical difficulty of the <br />variance request and the proposal appears to compare favorably with all of the above <br />requirements essential for approving variances; <br />Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br />