Laserfiche WebLink
a) Find the ratio of existing runoff volumes from the parcel (Vp,,.ce, ) to the total <br /> subwatershed (V,,,,,,identified by the City): <br /> % contribution= Vp,,.ce,l Vtotat x 100 <br /> b) Find the proportionate share of the problem (identified by the City). <br /> Vreduction= % contribution X Vprobdem <br /> c) Derive the % decrease in existing site runoff required on the development site to mitigate <br /> the proportionate share by the following formula: <br /> %existing runoff volume reduction (Vparced - Vreduction)l Vparced X 100 <br /> d) Apply the above reduction to the 1-year, 2-year, 10-year and 100-year existing site runoff <br /> volumes. The proposed design runoff volumes cannot exceed these reduced runoff <br /> volumes. <br /> 4) Design Computations. <br /> a) Hydrologic Data Format: All hydrologic data shall be completed using NRCS methodology; i.e. <br /> HydroCAD or TR20/TR55, XP-SWMM or a comparable, City approved method. Hydraulic <br /> calculations will be accepted in the rational method format or in commonly used software <br /> packages such as FHWA HY-8, Eagle Point or XP-SWMM or a compatible, City approved <br /> method. These computations shall be submitted to the City upon request. <br /> b) Rainfalls: Rainfall amounts for hydrologic analysis shall be based on the precipitation frequency <br /> estimates of NOAA Atlas 14 for the 24-hour return period from 1 to 100 Years. City of Roseville <br /> analyses shall use the values in the following table. <br /> Rainfall Frequency Rainfall(Inches) <br /> 1-Year 24-Hour 2.5 <br /> 2-Year 24-Hour 2.8 <br /> 10-Year 24-Hour 4.2 <br /> 100-Year 24-Hour 7.4 <br /> c) Infiltration-Prohibitive Sites: For projects not meeting the infiltration/volume control <br /> requirement as stated in Section 2(a), design engineers and developers shall determine the <br /> pollutant removal efficiency of the best management practices (BMPs) incorporated into the site <br /> plan using the available industry standard models, including P8 (using a standard NURP particle <br /> size distribution for the analysis), PondNET or a comparable model approved by the City. <br /> d) Wet-Detention Pond Storm Water Treatment: As an alternative to preparing a site-specific <br /> model, the development may provide a treatment volume (dead storage) of not less than two and <br /> one-half (2.5) inches multiplied by the runoff coefficient calculated over the contributing <br /> drainage area to the pond. For example, a one (1) acre impervious site with a runoff coefficient <br /> of 0.90 that drains to a common treatment pond would be required to provide a dead storage <br /> volume of 0.19 acre-feet or eight thousand two hundred (8,200) cubic feet. The Natural <br /> Resources Conservation Service Method may also be used upon City approval. <br /> e) Volume Reduction Calculation: The volume reduction (in cubic feet) provided by surface <br /> infiltration practices shall be computed using the following: <br /> Page 3 of 8 12/11/14 <br />