Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A <br />City of Roseville <br />2-3-16 <br />Page 5 <br />amend or clarify language within the code, and all changes must be <br />consistent with the intent of the original PUD approval. <br />3) All other proposed changes that do not qualify for an Administrative <br />Amendment and cannot be realized through a minor text change in the <br />overlay district language must be processed through a PUD Amendment. <br />This requires the applicant to restart the development process at the second <br />required open house. <br />(K) PUD Cancellation <br /> – In the unlikely event a PUD needs to be eliminated, this section <br />will guide the City process. <br />(L) Administration <br />– This section includes some generalized language we like to <br />include in our ordinances: protection from the 60-day rule due to procedures, and <br />regulations on preconstruction within a proposed PUD. <br />Public Hearing <br />The planning commission is asked to review the proposed ordinance and hold a public <br />hearing to obtain feedback on the regulations. Following the hearing, the Commission has <br />the following options: <br />1. RECOMMEND THAT COUNCIL APPROVE THE ORDINANCE LANGUAGE AS <br />PRESENTED OR WITH SPECIFIC EDITS; <br />2. RECOMMEND THAT COUNCIL DOES NOT ADOPT ANY CODE CHANGES; or <br />3. TABLE THE ITEM and request additional information or changes to the proposed language. <br />Attachments <br />Following this memo, staff has provided two documents to (hopefully) make understanding <br />and reviewing this ordinance easy. <br />Attachment B: <br /> This is a clean copy of the proposed language to allow for easy reading of <br />the ordinance. This copy also includes comments to explain specific provisions being <br />proposed. <br /> <br />