2015-11-04_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Special Planning CommissionMeeting Minutes –Wednesday, September 17, 2015 Page 23 located on the Vogel Mechanical property and not closing until 2:00 a.m., it could prove 1095 disruptive, as well as other potential uses. 1096 Chair Boguszewski stated he would be much more uncomfortable with a 10:00 p.m. restriction, 1097 using as an example, people just getting wound up after dinner or a movie by 10:00 p.m.While 1098 he may be willing to consider a Midnight tor 1:00 a.m. closing time, Chair Boguszewski stated he 1099 would find a 10:00 p.m. closing too restrictive, noting that Target is open until 11:00 p.m. 1100 Member Bull admitted he frequently utilized stores later in the night. 1101 Member Cunningham respectfully asked Member Bull to consider how that might impact him if 1102 that was immediately adjacent to his backyard. 1103 Member Murphy noted other CMU areas with 2:00 a.m. as the closing time as well. 1104 Member Bull expressed his concern in limiting business opportunities interested in coming into 1105 Roseville if the regulations were too restrictive and whether than may keep potential users from 1106 exploring those areas. 1107 Chair Boguszewski asked, if the time was pulled from 2:00 a.m. back to Midnight, depending on 1108 the nature of a potential use or business, askedstaff if there was a variance process that would 1109 apply, with staff responding that would be an option and an appropriate route to consider. 1110 Member Bull agreed that a variance process may be appropriate; however, if a business was 1111 considering locating in Roseville, would they review restrictions first noting that additional step in 1112 the process. 1113 Chair Boguszewski opined that they would probably look at the park dedication fee and other fees 1114 as the first step that may deter their interest. 1115 While understandingthe various points made by her colleagues, Member Cunningham opined 1116 that, if they wanted it to work, they’d come forward; but reiterated if CMU-1 is intended to be a 1117 buffer zone, a business operating until 2:00 a.m. was not a buffer and questioned if thattype of 1118 use was therefore desirable in this location anyway. 1119 Chair Boguszewski suggested, in the newly rewritten Item 6.a, that it be changed from 2:00 a.m. 1120 to Midnight, and otherwise mimic Item 6.b related to delivery traffic. 1121 Member Bull sought clarification as to whether the intent of Chair Boguszewski was also to 1122 restrict employee time as well in Item 6.c as well. 1123 Mr. Lloyd clarified that this section was the one raised via e-mail by Member Stellmach and 1124 discussed at the previous meeting regarding various issues, some of which were maybe being 1125 stumbled over now.By breaking up Sections 6.a, b and c, Mr. Lloyd advised that in thinking about 1126 retail or non-retail uses over the course of a day, his attempt had been to break them down. 1127 However, in retrospect, Mr. Lloyd suggested perhaps an additional section 6.d that addressed 1128 both retail and non-retail businesses for CMU-1 designations, and another for each of the other 1129 district designationsrather than as currently written.Mr. Lloyd sought clarification from the 1130 Commission as to whether they wanted to include customer or non-customer traffic as part of 1131 those provisions as well. 1132 Based on previous discussion, Chair Boguszewski responded that the restriction was for 1133 customers or others coming in, not necessarily workers (e.g. a baker can arrive on site, but not 1134 welcome the public until a later time). 1135 Mr. Bilotta suggested restricting customers and deliveries as applicable per CMU designation 1136 area.Mr. Bilotta stated that staff would refine the language to address the time differences and 1137 restrictions per tonight’s discussion (e.g. Midnight versus 2:00 a.m.). 1138 Chair Boguszewski sought consensus for revising language for CMU-1 designated areas for 1139 customers, deliveries and external traffic from 2:00 a.m. to Midnight. 1140 Member Murphy stated he was inclined to consider a 1:00 a.m. restriction. 1141 Member Bull noted that would address a potential use such as a pizza delivery shop. 1142