|
Regular Planning CommissionMeeting
<br />Minutes –Wednesday, June 4, 2014
<br />Page 6
<br />At the request of Member Boguszewski, Mr. Culver confirmed that the proposed
<br />246
<br />development would be an improvement on the current situation in terms of runoff in the
<br />247
<br />neighborhood.
<br />248
<br />Member Murphy concurred, noting that at the end of the day, the runoff from the
<br />249
<br />proposed development cannot be greater than today; with Mr. Culver responding
<br />250
<br />affirmatively.Member Murphy noted that, while there may be significant runoff today,with
<br />251
<br />this plan, tomorrow there may be less.Mr. Culver agreed, noting that it was difficult to
<br />252
<br />predict future excessive rainfall events versus typical events.
<br />253
<br />Mr. Mueller
<br />With recognition by Chair Gisselquist, came forward and clarified that a
<br />254
<br />neighbor directly behind his property (Irv Cross) experienced repeated flowing of his
<br />255
<br />backyard, with the last excessive rainfall finding water standing in their tennis court.
<br />256
<br />When the south side pond was originally installed half way between his lot line and the
<br />257
<br />roadbehind it, Mr. Mueller advised that it was intended to drain all of that property.
<br />258
<br />However, Mr. Mueller opined that its location should have actually been dropped another
<br />259
<br />six inches, as it does flood across Mr. Cross’s property; and if dropped, Mr. Cross’s land
<br />260
<br />would be okay.Mr. Mueller further noted that, a creek from Midland Grove through the lot
<br />261
<br />next to his and south, then west out to the street had originally been available to help
<br />262
<br />drainage, but neighbors had filled it in, with the City subsequently putting in a drain
<br />263
<br />halfway through it to catch excess runoff.
<br />264
<br />Regarding the projected sales price of homes and/o lots, Mr. Mueller responded that they
<br />265
<br />would be equal or above existing homes in the neighborhood.
<br />266
<br />Gary Boryczka, 2250 Acorn Road
<br />267
<br />Mr. Boryczkastate that, the previous time this proposal was brought up in 2007, the
<br />268
<br />neighbors had many concerns about drainage of water; and as the plan is drawn up right
<br />269
<br />now, and even though the Engineer stated there would be no changes, from his
<br />270
<br />perspective, runoff would increase on the south side by the hill, if the hill was removed,
<br />271
<br />and the overflow of the pond will run and add water to the south side directly onto the
<br />272
<br />neighbor’s property. Based on his experience in the excavating business for forty-seven
<br />273
<br />years, Mr. Boryczkaopined that this wholeplan is a pipe dream to get lots in there; and
<br />274
<br />his main concern was that there was no place to drain water.Mr. Boryczka noted that he
<br />275
<br />just had his lot split, and even though it had nothing to do with water, the question was
<br />276
<br />brought up for that minimal ¾ acre parcel, even though no variances were required, and
<br />277
<br />he had provided a place for his water to go prior to it even being brought up by staff.
<br />278
<br />Mr. Boryczkastated that the major easement to the main culvert draining the whole area
<br />279
<br />goes directly throughthis property, and with Mr. Mueller’s attempt now to make the
<br />280
<br />roadway radius smaller, it was basically so Mr. Mueller could destroy the neighborhood.
<br />281
<br />Mr. Boryczkaasked if anyone had looked at some of the larger homes in that
<br />282
<br />neighborhood, opining that no way could anyone built a $1 million home on these tiny
<br />283
<br />lots, further opining that Mr. Mueller would take his $400,000 home and demolish it and
<br />284
<br />expect to develop and sell lots. Mr. Boryczkastated “good luck.”
<br />285
<br />Mr. Boryczkastated his other concerns included his rationale for not filing his plat
<br />286
<br />previously, opining that it was in going back originally to the 1960’s when water and
<br />287
<br />sewer was installed, and taxes or assessments were deferred for the lot split, he was the
<br />288
<br />second one in.Since no assessments were paid yet, and to him there were excessive,
<br />289
<br />Mr. Boryczkastated that he was waiting to file his plat; until the City made a deal with
<br />290
<br />another Roseville property owner to change the assessments to connection charges,
<br />291
<br />which were then never paid.Since he had three title insurance policies, Mr. Boryczka
<br />292
<br />stated that the first would have covered all this they way it was, but the second he
<br />293
<br />informed the City about it, they changed it and took him to court, with the City stating that
<br />294
<br />all the developer had to do was look at the book on the counter.Therefore, Mr. Boryczka
<br />295
<br />stated that he ended up paying out the money and it took five years to do so, and that
<br />296
<br />was the reason he never filed his plat; which was similar to Mr. Mueller and his problems.
<br />297
<br />Mr. Boryczkaopined that the neighbors won the case, at which time the City went back
<br />298
<br />and reworded things, and then the project went ahead; however, by that time, the bottom
<br />299
<br />
<br />
|