CC_Minutes_2016_0418 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, April 18, 2016 Page 27 this session, Councilmember Willmus opined it would behoove the City to provide a formal statement of that position to the State legislature. Mayor Roe advised that Ramsey County had initiated conversations with community representa- tives (e.g. Mayors and area Chambers of Commerce) about their general economic development activities. Mayor Roe reported that the outcome of that discussion was a consensus that more discussion was needed. To then find out that special legislation was already being considered this session, Mayor Roe stated was a concern for him. As stated by Councilmember Willmus, Mayor Roe agreed that formal communication with the Legislature was needed. Councilmember McGehee agreed, opining that it struck her as a variant of the Fiscal Disparities Program, under which the City of Roseville served as a provider of many resources. Since Ram- sey County seems to have a lot of big plans (TCAAP, infrastructure needs, St. Paul soccer stadi- um, etc.) Councilmember McGehee agreed that the City of Roseville needed to take care of its own first. Councilmember McGehee noted that the City of Roseville was now on a program course that it had long sought, and she was not interested in the city's resources going toward the needs of other municipalitiesbefore those of Roseville. Councilmember Laliberte agreed, and also expressed her concerns with no transparency in this process for residents, who would potentially be paying this tax to another new taxing authority, not being able to weigh in. In her review and comparison of Washington County's Community Development legislation, Councilmember Laliberte advised that they had studied the possibility for three years, including conversations during that time with all municipal city councils and townships, seeking resolutions of support from each and having those available when bringing the request before the State Legislature. Councilmember Laliberte also agreed with a formal reg- istering of concerns. If it is such a great idea but didn't succeed during this session, Coun- cilmember Laliberte noted that it would then allow other communications and public transparen- cy issues to be addressed, and would still be the same great idea for the next Legislative Session. Councilmember Laliberte noted that the City of Roseville had just created its own EDA, and this appeared to be a dual taxation for Roseville residents; while Washington County had combined their community development and economic development efforts versus Ramsey County at- tempting to have the ability to levy under a new EDA levy while retaining its current HRA levy. While unable to answer for sure at this point, City Manager Trudgeon advised that he suspected Ramsey County may be seeking to move their existing HRA into a new EDA, but he had been unable to discern that from his reading of the proposed legislation. City Manager Trudgeon advised that staff had prepared a draft resolution for consideration by the City Council at tonight's meeting of a future meeting. Consensus of the body was to consider the resolution tonight; with Ms. Collins displaying the draft resolution while being reviewed the City Council, and providing a brief review of the pro- posed language to address City of Roseville concerns.