My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-03-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-03-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2016 8:39:08 AM
Creation date
4/27/2016 8:38:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/22/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
However, Mr. Freihammer reviewed Alternate 2 that would involve a paved drain system <br /> of permeable concrete blocks tied together and laid out in large sections. While the <br /> finished product looks like individual pavers, Mr. Freihammer advised that with them <br /> tied together as a block, they were more stable, and water flowed through the blocks to <br /> the under-drain rocks and then into the lake. Mr. Freihammer noted that this system <br /> provided a treatment for that water before it entered the lake. <br /> Mr. Freihammer reviewed preliminary cost estimates at $310,000 and allocation of those <br /> costs as follows: <br /> • Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District = $ 50,000 grant <br /> • City cost (from storm sewer utility funds) _ $195,000 <br /> • Residents (assessment for 25% of the cost) _ $ 65,000 <br /> Mr. Freihammer noted that the total project cost would include the typical 10% <br /> contingency to cover unanticipated incidentals. At the usual 5% interest rate for special <br /> assessments, recognizing that the assessments would be based on the actual construction <br /> costs following completion of the project, Mr. Freihammer anticipated assessment costs <br /> for each homeowner over the assessment term of 15 years to be approximately <br /> $1,127.18/year. <br /> Mr. Freihammer advised that the city had never assessed a project such as this to-date for <br /> storm sewer improvements. Mr. Freihammer noted that preliminary costs suggested <br /> those estimated total cost would be approximately $8,133/lot for the eight lots affected. <br /> However, Mr. Freihammer noted that the final assessment amount would be based on <br /> actual construction costs, and therefore may vary some. <br /> Mr. Freihammer advised that the benefit would be that the storm water runoff would be <br /> treated prior to entering the lake and captured for treatment through infiltration instead of <br /> flowing overland directly into the lake. Also, Mr. Freihammer noted that by moving <br /> from gravel driveways to a hard surface, property owners should experience easier <br /> maintenance and snowplowing. <br /> At the request of Member Cihacek, Mr. Freihammer advised that the city's current <br /> assessment policy typically assesses homeowners at 25% of the total project costs for <br /> improvement projects. <br /> In 1995 storm sewer dollars, Mr. Culver noted that such an improvement would have <br /> been approximately $3,000 to $4,000 rather than that estimated in today's costs. At the <br /> request of Member Cihacek, Mr. Culver also confirmed that the project would be <br /> contingent on receipt of grant funds and assessments from residents. Mr. Culver also <br /> noted that if the project went forward, it would require a formal public hearing and <br /> support by those residents before being authorized by the City Council, and if not, there <br /> would be no project. <br /> At the request of Member Lenz, Mr. Culver advised that the private road meant that the <br /> maintenance and ownership of the roadway is the responsibility of the private property <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.