2015-10-07_PC_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning CommissionMeeting Minutes – Wednesday, September 2, 2015 Page 3 noting the maximum height allowed at 65 in RB zoning districts, Mr. Paschke stated that 99 he anticipated the ramp to be much lower than that maximum allowable. 100 With the addition of more impervious surface with this addition and site changes, Chair 101 Boguszewski asked staff to review their Condition “B” in more detail and additional 102 stormwater management for the broader area. 103 Mr. Paschke advised that as part of the redevelopment project, the applicant would be 104 required to meet existing standards under current requirements of City Code and the 105 area watershed district versus pre-existing or previous standards.Regarding the broader 106 area component, Mr. Paschke noted that this area was already problematic and the City 107 would ask the applicant, JLL, to work with the City and watershed district to create 108 additional capacity within their stormwater pond to hold more water back and avoid any 109 downstream issues, and as a cost-share opportunity as part of the improvements. 110 Public Works Director/City Engineer Mark Culver agreed with Mr. Paschke’s assessment, 111 noting that any improvements or disturbed areas, such as this proposed project, required 112 the applicant and City of Roseville to work with the watershed district for mitigation 113 efforts.As Mr. Paschke noted, Mr. Culver noted that this was a problem area as far as 114 capacity of pipes north of the Rosedale Center, and while making no guarantees of what 115 may occur, City staff was looking forward to the opportunity to partner with JLL and the 116 watershed district to expand required stormwater management and mitigation to benefit 117 the area north or upstream of the Rosedale Center. 118 At the request of Member Murphy, Mr. Culver advised that there would be no long-term 119 stormwater flowing southalong Fairview as a result of this improvement.Member Murphy 120 noted that currently a lake typically formed in that area during larger rainfall events.Mr. 121 Culver noted that with more capacity as anticipated, the City could relieve flow at one 122 point that would facilitate drainage from other points going north as well. 123 Applicant Representatives 124 Bill Mosten, Senior VP of Retail with JLL 125 Mr. Mosten noted there were other representatives of the Rosedale Center’s 126 management team in the audience, as well as representatives from Dorsey/Whitney, and 127 Kimley Horn. 128 Mr. Mosten advised that they were in agreement with staff’s presentation, and expressed 129 their appreciation of staff’s support and the applicant’s excitement going forward. 130 At the request of Member Murphy, Mr. Mosten estimated the process, while the schedule 131 was still evolving, should be completed in approximately two years, either late in 2017 or 132 early in 2018. 133 Public Comment 134 Chair Boguszewski closed the public hearing at 6:26p.m.; no one spokefor or against. 135 MOTION 136 Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Bull torecommend to the City 137 Council approval of the proposed PRELIMINARY PLAT as presented at this 138 meeting of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Rosedale Fifth Addition located at 1700 139 County Road B-2 and 1705 Highway 36; based on the comments, findings, and 140 conditions contained the project report dated September 2, 2015. 141 Ayes: 5 142 Nays: 0 143 Motion carried. 144 MOTION 145 MemberMurphy moved, seconded by Member Cunningham torecommend to the 146 City Council approval of the proposed amendment to Planned Unit Development 147 (PUD) #3608 including: 148