My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-10-07_PC_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2015 Agendas
>
2015-10-07_PC_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2016 12:44:20 PM
Creation date
4/27/2016 12:44:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment D <br />1 <br />2 <br />Definitions being added or amended: <br />3 <br />Caliper Inch Measurement –The standard of tree trunk measurement for replacement or <br />4 <br />landscaping trees. The caliper inch measurement of the trunk shall be taken at six (6) inches <br />5 <br />above the ground for trees up to and including four (4) inch caliper size, and twelve (12) inches <br />6 <br />above the ground for trees larger than four (4) inch caliper. <br />7 <br />Coniferous/Evergreen Tree–Awoody plant having foliage on the outermost portions of the <br />8 <br />branches year-round which at maturity is at least twelve (12) feet or more in height. Tamaracks <br />9 <br />and Larch are included as coniferous tree species. <br />10 <br />Deciduous Tree– A woody plant, which sheds leaves annually, having a defined crown and at <br />11 <br />maturity is at least fifteen (15) feet or more in height. <br />12 <br />Diameter Breast Height (DBH) –The diameter of trees at breast height, measured 4 ½ feet (54 <br />13 <br />inches) above the ground. Multi-stem trees shall be considered as one tree with the measurement <br />Commented \[BGA1\]: <br />14 <br />We now address what should be <br />done in the event that a multi-stemmed tree is <br />of the largest stem at Diameter Breast Height constituting the size of the tree. <br />15 <br />encountered. <br />Dripline –A vertical line extending from the outer surface of a tree’s branch tips down to the <br />Commented \[BGA2\]: <br />16 <br />A definition for “dripline” has <br />now been added as we allow applicants, at their <br />ground. <br />17 <br />discretion, to require a greater protection zone via <br />dripline if they so choose to do so. <br />Invasive. Any tree species that is not native to Minnesota or its regional ecosystem that can <br />18 <br />spread or be spread into any non-cultivated soil site and establish itself, expanding the plant <br />19 <br />species’ population by its own volition and generally harm, destroy or prevent native plants. <br />20 <br />Invasive tree species include Norway Maple, Black Locust, Amur Maple, Siberian Elm, and <br />21 <br />Buckthorn. <br />22 <br />Tree Protection Zone –An area around a tree defined by either the tree’s unique dripline, or the <br />23 <br />Commented \[BGA3\]: <br />By creating a “typical” root <br />protection zone, we establish a system where MOST trees <br />tree’s typical root protection zone. <br />24 <br />will be fully protected. Individual trees and species types <br />may have root zones that protrude further than this <br />Typical Root Protection Zone –A circle radius around a tree in feet equal to 1.25 times the tree’s <br />25 <br />standard, but completing individual assessments on a per <br />tree basis can place a large financial burden on an <br />diameter breast height for both deciduous and coniferous trees. <br />26 <br />applicant. As this ordinance will impact individual <br />property owners and not just deep pocket developers, <br />27 <br />instituting a reasonable approach was our goal. Note that <br />many communities use a 1:1 ratio, and some use a 1: 1.5; <br />we have chosen this intermediate ratio, but would also <br />support an increase to 1.5 to be more conservative. S&S <br />believes either will work (with 1.5 obviously providing <br />additional protection). <br />Should an applicant wish to be MORE protective, this <br />ordinance would allow them to utilize driplines to define <br />protection boundaries, but in no instance would a <br />protection zone be any less than the defined Typical Root <br />Protection Zone. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.