My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
ord_1243
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Ordinances
>
1200
>
ord_1243
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:44:20 AM
Creation date
12/3/2004 8:46:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Ordinances
Ordinance #
1243
Ordinance Title
Amending Title III, Chapter 302 of the Roseville City Code Relating to Liquor, Allowing Voluntary Manager and Server Training, Regulating Home Delivery of Alcoholic Beverages, and Changing Penalties for Violations
Ordinance Date Passed
11/27/2000
Ordinance Date Published
12/12/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />SECTION 3. Section 302.15 of the Roseville City Code is amended to read as <br />follows: <br /> <br />302.15: CIVIL PENALTY: <br /> <br />A. Penalty for Noncompliance: In addition to any criminal penalties which may <br />be imposed by a court of law, the City Council may suspend a license for up to <br />sixty (60) days, may revoke a license and/or may impose a civil fine on a licensee <br />not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each violation on a finding that <br />the license holder or its employee has failed to comply with a statute, rule or <br />ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages, nonintoxicating malt liquor or wine. <br /> <br />B. Minimum Penalty. The purpose of this Section is to establish a standard by which <br />the City Council determines the length of license suspensions and the propriety of <br />revocations, and shall apply to all premises licensed under this Chapter. These <br />penalties are presumed to be appropriate for every case; however, the Council may <br />deviate in an individual case where the Council finds that there exist substantial <br />reasons making it more appropriate to deviate, such as, but not limited to, a licensee's <br />efforts in combination with the State or City to prevent the sale of alcohol to minors <br />or, in the converse, when a licensee has a history of repeated violations of state or <br />local liquor laws. When deviating from these standards, the Council will provide <br />written findings that support the penalty selected. <br /> <br />The following violations are presumed to require revocation of the license on the first <br />violation. <br />· Commission of a felony related to the licensed activity. <br />· Sale of alcoholic beverages while license is under suspension. <br />· Sale of intoxicating liquor where only license is for 3.2 percent malt liquor. <br /> <br />Other violations, including the following shall have a presumed penalty as indicated <br />below. <br /> <br />· Sale of alcoholic beverages to under-age persons. <br />· Sale of alcoholic beverages to obviously intoxicated person. <br />· After hours sale/display/consumption of alcoholic beverage. <br />· Illegal gambling on premises. <br />· Failure to take reasonable steps to stop person from leaving premises with <br />alcoholic beverages (on-sale allowing off-sale). <br /> <br />1. For ON-SALE license holders who participate in Optional Manager and <br />Server Training and prove the person who sold or served alcohol had <br />received city approved alcohol beverage server training within the <br />previous year: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.