Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, June 4, 2014 <br />Page 6 <br />At the request of Member Boguszewski, Mr. Culver confirmed that the proposed <br />246 <br />development would be an improvement on the current situation in terms of runoff in the <br />247 <br />neighborhood. <br />248 <br />Member Murphy concurred, noting that at the end of the day, the runoff from the <br />249 <br />proposed development cannot be greater than today; with Mr. Culver responding <br />250 <br />affirmatively. Member Murphy noted that, while there may be significant runoff today, with <br />251 <br />this plan, tomorrow there may be less. Mr. Culver agreed, noting that it was difficult to <br />252 <br />predict future excessive rainfall events versus typical events. <br />253 <br />Mr. Mueller <br />With recognition by Chair Gisselquist, came forward and clarified that a <br />254 <br />neighbor directly behind his property (Irv Cross) experienced repeated flowing of his <br />255 <br />backyard, with the last excessive rainfall finding water standing in their tennis court. <br />256 <br />When the south side pond was originally installed half way between his lot line and the <br />257 <br />road behind it, Mr. Mueller advised that it was intended to drain all of that property. <br />258 <br />However, Mr. Mueller opined that its location should have actually been dropped another <br />259 <br />six inches, as it does flood across Mr. Cross’s property; and if dropped, Mr. Cross’s land <br />260 <br />would be okay. Mr. Mueller further noted that, a creek from Midland Grove through the lot <br />261 <br />next to his and south, then west out to the street had originally been available to help <br />262 <br />drainage, but neighbors had filled it in, with the City subsequently putting in a drain <br />263 <br />halfway through it to catch excess runoff. <br />264 <br />Regarding the projected sales price of homes and/o lots, Mr. Mueller responded that they <br />265 <br />would be equal or above existing homes in the neighborhood. <br />266 <br />Gary Boryczka, 2250 Acorn Road <br />267 <br />Mr. Boryczka state that, the previous time this proposal was brought up in 2007, the <br />268 <br />neighbors had many concerns about drainage of water; and as the plan is drawn up right <br />269 <br />now, and even though the Engineer stated there would be no changes, from his <br />270 <br />perspective, runoff would increase on the south side by the hill, if the hill was removed, <br />271 <br />and the overflow of the pond will run and add water to the south side directly onto the <br />272 <br />neighbor’s property. Based on his experience in the excavating business for forty-seven <br />273 <br />years, Mr. Boryczka opined that this whole plan is a pipe dream to get lots in there; and <br />274 <br />his main concern was that there was no place to drain water. Mr. Boryczka noted that he <br />275 <br />just had his lot split, and even though it had nothing to do with water, the question was <br />276 <br />brought up for that minimal ¾ acre parcel, even though no variances were required, and <br />277 <br />he had provided a place for his water to go prior to it even being brought up by staff. <br />278 <br />Mr. Boryczka stated that the major easement to the main culvert draining the whole area <br />279 <br />goes directly through this property, and with Mr. Mueller’s attempt now to make the <br />280 <br />roadway radius smaller, it was basically so Mr. Mueller could destroy the neighborhood. <br />281 <br />Mr. Boryczka asked if anyone had looked at some of the larger homes in that <br />282 <br />neighborhood, opining that no way could anyone built a $1 million home on these tiny <br />283 <br />lots, further opining that Mr. Mueller would take his $400,000 home and demolish it and <br />284 <br />expect to develop and sell lots. Mr. Boryczka stated “good luck.” <br />285 <br />Mr. Boryczka stated his other concerns included his rationale for not filing his plat <br />286 <br />previously, opining that it was in going back originally to the 1960’s when water and <br />287 <br />sewer was installed, and taxes or assessments were deferred for the lot split, he was the <br />288 <br />second one in. Since no assessments were paid yet, and to him there were excessive, <br />289 <br />Mr. Boryczka stated that he was waiting to file his plat; until the City made a deal with <br />290 <br />another Roseville property owner to change the assessments to connection charges, <br />291 <br />which were then never paid. Since he had three title insurance policies, Mr. Boryczka <br />292 <br />stated that the first would have covered all this they way it was, but the second he <br />293 <br />informed the City about it, they changed it and took him to court, with the City stating that <br />294 <br />all the developer had to do was look at the book on the counter. Therefore, Mr. Boryczka <br />295 <br />stated that he ended up paying out the money and it took five years to do so, and that <br />296 <br />was the reason he never filed his plat; which was similar to Mr. Mueller and his problems. <br />297 <br />Mr. Boryczka opined that the neighbors won the case, at which time the City went back <br />298 <br />and reworded things, and then the project went ahead; however, by that time, the bottom <br />299 <br /> <br />