2014_10_08_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, October 8, 2014 Page 11 Member Boguszewski stated that, and subsequent to tonight’s action, encouraging 506 attendees to submit their own summaries as part of the process, especially as addressed 507 by Mr. Lloyd, in altering that language to the invitation letters drafted for developers (page 508 2, lines 34-37). 509 Ayes: 5 510 Nays: 0 511 Motion carried. 512 d. Project File 0017-Amendment 23 513 Request by the Community Development Department to amend certain 514 requirements contained in Roseville City Code, Section 1009.03 (Interim Uses) 515 Chair Gisselquist opened the Public Hearing at 8:12 p.m. 516 City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request as detailed in the staff report dated 517 October 8, 2014, specifically highlighting the proposed amendment for Interim Use in 518 lines 63 – 71 of the report. In addition to the proposed amendments noted in the report, 519 Mr. Paschke suggested another possible amendment to Item 3 (lines 70-71) to read: 520 “\[Upon an event\] that will terminate…” Mr. Paschke advised that this language was 521 based on MN State Statute 2013, Section 394.303 Interim Uses, and was the preferred 522 language of the Community Development Department versus totally eliminating the 523 language in #3 (line 70). 524 Chair Gisselquist asked staff to clarify the scope of the action, noting that the Vogel 525 Sheetmetal case had been acted on previously, and was not before the Commission as 526 part of this request, with that already at the City Council level; and the purpose of this 527 proposed text amendment was to allow more flexibility in terms. 528 Mr. Paschke confirmed that the Vogel Sheetmetal Interim Use had been approved by the 529 City Council and was moving forward in the process. 530 Chair Gisselquist further asked staff to address how this could impact the Vogel 531 Sheetmetal Interim Use, as they were seeking financing to make their improvements and 532 the only way to obtain it was through changed zoning and comprehensive plan 533 amendment to make the site and use a permitted use; or through seeking an Interim Use 534 that could support a duration of twenty years with other conditions applied. In order to do 535 anything different, Chair Gisselquist clarified that even if the Commission recommended 536 amending the language today, anyone wanting to do something different, including the 537 Vogel’s, would need to reapply. 538 Mr. Paschke advised that not a lot of people sought to extend their Interim Use, but 539 anyone was able to apply for an Interim Use. As he’d indicated in his summary before, 540 the Interim Use was for a use not currently allowed in City Code, and there were not 541 many currently out there other than Vogel that came immediately to mind. 542 At the prompting of Member Daire related to the Spire Credit Union on tonight’s agenda, 543 Mr. Paschke clarified that the Planning Commission’s recommendation for approval of 544 their Interim Use request for signage had yet to be approved by the City Council. Mr. 545 Paschke further noted that the State Fair could seek a longer exemption than their 546 current five year renewals; but again clarified that each Interim use was no different than 547 any other Planning application and was reviewed on its own merits and requirements on 548 a case by case basis. If these amendments are approved, Mr. Paschke opined that the 549 Commission would probably see Vogel Sheetmetal seeking an amendment to their 550 current Interim Use permit to seek an extension of their timeframe to allow improvements 551 to be made to the building. 552 Chair Gisselquist stated that he had gotten the impression from reports and NextDoor 553 comments that this discussion was focused on Vogel Sheetmetal; however, he now 554 understood that it has impacts not only to their Permit, but others as well. 555