2016-04-06_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, April 6, 2016 Page 19 Member Gitzen and Interim Community Development Director Collins agreed with that question 899 and the intent of the task force as to how that was intended to be defined. 900 Chair Boguszewski recognized that the point may need further clarification; however, he noted 901 that the intent was for a trigger to kick off signage on a site, not necessarily specifically for mailed 902 documents, but to trigger alternative remedies once a project was kicked into that higher level 903 category. Chair Boguszewski suggested Ms. Collins further question that at the staff level 904 depending on where approval of this task force report was in the process. 905 Ms. Collins suggested that could also be determined by the City Council as they review and 906 consider the recommendations of the joint task force. 907 Member Daire opined that it was instructive to note that while the state requires a 350’ notification 908 area, the City of Roseville has already exceeded that with a standard 500’ notification boundary, 909 well beyond statutory requirements, with this representing a still greater and significant step. 910 Member Gitzen agreed with Member Cunningham in praise for the work of the task force. As 911 noted by Member Daire, Member Gitzen noted what this represented for the livability of the 912 community, whether as a renter or property owner, and the importance of that part of the process 913 to reach out to all who are part of the community. 914 Member Bull stated that his only comment or thoughts on the report were those expressed about 915 the extraordinary notification as previously mentioned and whether it was intended to be so 916 vague, especially when trying to define a fee structure if not established on a case by case basis. 917 Regarding social media and web page input, Member Bull also questioned who would be 918 responsible for that input, its maintenance and to what standards. 919 Chair Boguszewski clarified that the charge to the task force was to recommend guiding goals to 920 the City Council, and if and when approved by them along with staff input related to costs and a 921 timeline for implementation, those specifics would be addressed as part of making adopted 922 recommendations work. 923 MOTION 924 Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Cunningham to recommend to the City 925 Council ratification and support for the Joint Report on Zoning Notification Procedures 926 and Policies (Attachment #2) dated February 4, 2016 as presented. 927 Ayes: 7 928 Nays: 0 929 Motion carried. 930 Chair Boguszewski asked Ms. Collins to alert Community Engagement Commissioners 931 Grefenberg and Manke of tonight’s action by the Planning Commission. 932 9. Adjourn 933 MOTION 934 Member Daire moved, Member Cunningham seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 9:14 p.m. 935 Ayes: 7 936 Nays: 0 937 Motion carried. 938