2016-04-06_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, April 6, 2016 Page 9 Specific to the condition that all required screening be installed no later than June 30, 402 2016, Member Murphy questioned if that date still allowed realistic compliance for the 403 applicant, given that another month had ensued awaiting resolution of this issue. 404 Member Murphy suggested extending that date to July 29, 2016 to allow additional 405 working days for the Vogels and their contractors to accomplish the task. 406 Chair Boguszewski recognized the applicant representative(s) in the audience regarding 407 whether they could accomplish the work by June 30, 2016, with the applicant expressing 408 no preference for a June or July completion date, leaving it at the discretion of the 409 commission. 410 Members Daire and Murphy withdrew their motion from the March 2, 2016 meeting, 411 leaving no motion currently on the table. 412 MOTION (lines 96 – 101 of staff report dated April 6, 2016) 413 Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Gitzen to recommend to the City 414 Council approval of a CONDITIONAL USE allowing limited production and 415 processing as an accessory use at 2830 Fairview Avenue, based on the comments 416 and findings contained, and subject to stated conditions for approval as detailed in 417 the staff reports dated March 2 and April 6, 2016; amended as follows (lines 72 – 77 418 of staff report dated April 6, 2016): 419  A solid opaque cedar fence approximately 6.5’ in height shall be installed north 420 of the existing eastern parking lot to screen the lot, including delivery and dock 421 doors and the refuse/recycling areas. 422  Additional landscaping shall be installed in and around the berm adjacent to 423 the front employee and customer parking lot to more fully screen headlights 424 from view of the adjacent residentially zoned properties. 425  All required screening shall be installed no later than July 29, 2016. 426 At the request of his colleagues, Member Murphy clarified that it was his intent to exclude 427 Condition C (lines 108-109) from his motion, noting this would be addressed by existing 428 city code in verifying any excessive noises based on complaints through the city’s noise 429 ordinance or other requirements. 430 AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION (lines 108-109 of staff report dated April 6, 2016) 431 Member Bull moved, seconded by Member Cunningham an additional condition as 432 follows: 433  Production areas doors shall be closed during limited production and 434 processing operations. 435 Member Bull noted that since a CU follows the property, future permitted uses for limited 436 production/processing could entail additional environmental factors beyond sound for 437 measurement at the lot line; and while possibly intermittent may prove impactful for 438 adjacent residential properties. 439 If such a condition is added for this CU application, Member Murphy asked if it was then 440 the intent of this commission to add this as a condition or constraint for all such city-wide 441 uses in the future. 442 Member Cunningham responded affirmatively, if such a use is located this close to a 443 residential neighborhood where their health, welfare and safety could be impacted. 444 Chair Boguszewski clarified that this commission did not serve in the role of a tort court; 445 and while this may be comparable, opined that the body would not be channeling future 446 discussion intent on resorting to this for future uses. 447 Member Murphy noted that in this situation, the loading dock doors face to the east and 448 therefore sound would be channeled in that direction onto that commercial property. 449