My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-05-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-05-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2016 4:24:58 PM
Creation date
5/19/2016 4:24:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/24/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
676 Member Seigler suggested that should be re-analyzed when a resident remodeled <br /> 677 of sought to improve their property. <br /> 678 <br /> 679 Specific to Items 2 and 3 of Attachment C, Chair Cihacek noted the apparent lack <br /> 680 of consensus; with conceptual agreement with lowering the stormwater volume <br /> 681 from 10,000 square feet to 5,000 square feet to be consistent with that of <br /> 682 watershed districts; and agreement in principle, but not conforming with reality. <br /> 683 Specifically, Chair Cihacek noted the need for more details on the permit process <br /> 684 and tangible impacts for water quality overall as part of that stormwater <br /> 685 management goal. <br /> 686 <br /> 687 Regarding the fund itself, Chair Cihacek asked that staff flesh out how the fund <br /> 688 actually works (e.g. detailed financing, how and if it can be borrowed against, <br /> 689 whether it would remain segregated or incorporated in the General Fund, how it <br /> 690 could or would work with tax increment financing or other financing tools) to <br /> 691 determine what was actually viable. <br /> 692 <br /> 693 Member Seigler agreed, opining that this comes across as a gimmick for him right <br /> 694 now. <br /> 695 <br /> 696 While not having the actual data available tonight, Mr. Freihammer noted that <br /> 697 building permit applications continued to increase annually as residents expand <br /> 698 their homes. <br /> 699 <br /> 700 Member Wozniak noted his difficulty in understanding the design of these <br /> 701 attachments: whether as fact sheets or standards; and suggested that for the <br /> 702 general public,plainer language was needed to get across their intent. <br /> 703 <br /> 704 Chair Cihacek suggested a breakdown between residential and commercial <br /> 705 properties and applications, since the decision-making could be different and <br /> 706 involve a different process for both applications; as well as making it easier to <br /> 707 read. <br /> 708 <br /> 709 9. Possible Items for Next Meeting—May 24, 2016 <br /> 710 • Annual MS4 Permit Public Hearing by Environmental Engineer Ryan <br /> 711 Johnson <br /> 712 • Follow-up on Tonight's Stormwater Discussion/Additional Information <br /> 713 • Communication items from Staff <br /> 714 • Solar Process Update <br /> 715 • Recycling RFP Status Update <br /> 716 • Right-of-Way Discussion (Seigler) <br /> 717 Member Seigler asked that staff, including Public Works Director Culver, <br /> 718 return with something more formal, including input from the Planning <br /> 719 Commission on how calculations are done. <br /> 720 • Pathway Master Plan Update and its Conformance to other Development <br /> 721 Plans (Cihacek) <br /> Page 16 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.