My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-05-25_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda_Packet
>
2016
>
2016-05-25_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2016 10:36:04 AM
Creation date
5/23/2016 10:35:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6b. Attachment A <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 18, 2016 <br />Page 23 <br />TCAAP. Councilmember McGehee opined that could be a real possibility as <br />TCAAP develops. While Roseville may have some problems, Councilmember <br />McGehee noted that it also has many wonderful opportunities, including its parks <br />and other amenities, but needs to be careful that the community doesn’t develop <br />into or become known only for Rosedale and a number of nursing homes. Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee opined that Roseville could actually be a complete commu- <br />nity versus emphasizing those two existing areas now most evident. <br />Councilmember Willmus agreed with Councilmember McGehee’s comments. <br />If other things come to mind after tonight’s meeting, Ms. King encouraged indi- <br />vidual Councilmembers to email city staff to forward that information or addi- <br />tional ideas to incorporate one way or another to her prior to her next meeting <br />with her scheduled for late May. <br />Councilmember McGehee opined it was important to plan for the Roseville com- <br />munity, not that of the Cities of Edina or St. Louis Park. <br />Interim Community Development Director Collins noted examples of many <br />communities using their websites for a significant level of outreach to its busi- <br />nesses, with a page designated for such a spotlight. Since the business communi- <br />ty is very much a part of Roseville as well, Ms. Collins sought feedback from the <br />City Council as to their interest in developing a business spotlight on the City’s <br />website. <br />Councilmember Willmus noted that the City News newsletter already had a full <br />page focus for businesses. <br />Ms. Collins recognized that, but also noted opportunities to focus on particular <br />businesses in the community (e.g. biotech hub) and unique virtual tours that the <br />City could provide for public information. Ms. Collins noted that Greater Minne- <br />apolis/St. Paul had been pushing such spotlights for growing industries such as <br />were occurring in Roseville, providing certification for these regional areas. <br />In late May, an evolution of the matrix on the following page (Attachment A) <br />will provide the Council /EDA with a range of options for enhanced economic <br />development activity in the community. Suggestions for changes to draft cat- <br />egories identified; and discussion of each element including individual Coun- <br />cilmember thoughts about Roseville’s current status and desirable future di- <br />rection. <br />Ms. King advised that she had developed this list in part from her review of avail- <br />able city documents; and asked if the City Council had an appetite for more ag- <br />gressive approaches in any of these categories. <br />Mayor Roe and Councilmembers Willmus and McGehee responded affirmatively. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.