Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RCA Exhibit A <br /> <br />1. Lots which are appropriate for their location and suitable for residential development often have: <br />147 <br />a.sidelotlinesthatareapproximatelyperpendicularorradialtofrontthe lotline(s)ofthe <br />148 <br />parcel(s) being subdivided, or <br />149 <br />b. side lot lines that are approximately parallel to the side lot line(s) of the parcel(s) being <br />150 <br />subdivided, or <br />151 <br />c. side lot lines that are both approximately perpendicular or radial to the front lot line(s) and <br />152 <br />approximately parallel to the side lot line(s) of the parcel(s) being subdivided. <br />153 <br />2. It is acknowledged, however, that property boundaries represent the limits of property ownership, <br />154 <br />and subdivision applicants often cannot change those boundaries to make them more regular if the <br />155 <br />boundaries have complex or unusual alignments. Subdivisions of such irregularly-shaped parcels <br />156 <br />may be considered, but the shapes of proposed new lots might be found to be too irregular, and <br />157 <br />consequently, applications can be denied for failing to conform adequately to the purposes for <br />158 <br />which simple, regular parcel shapes are considered most appropriate and suitable for residential <br />159 <br />development. <br />160 <br />3. <br />161 <br />beside a neighboring parcel and have the bulk of land area (i.e., the located behind that <br />162 <br />neighboring parcel, are not permitted, because the flag pole does not meet the required minimum <br />163 <br />lot width according to the standard measurement procedure. <br />164 <br /> <br />PC <br />UBLIC OMMENT <br />165 <br />At the time this report was prepared, Planning Division staff has not received any communication <br />166 <br />from the public about the proposal to amend the Subdivision Code. <br />167 <br /> <br />RA <br />ECOMMENDED CTION <br />168 <br />By motion, recommend approval of the proposed amendments to §1103.06 of the City <br /> <br />169 <br />Code, <br />based on the comments and findings of this report. <br />170 <br /> <br />AA <br />LTERNATIVE CTIONS <br />171 <br />Pass a motion to table the item for future action. <br /> <br />172 <br />By motion, recommend denial of the proposal. <br /> <br />173 <br /> <br />Prepared by: Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd <br />651-792-7073 <br />bryan.lloyd@cityofroseville.com <br /> <br />PROJ0001_Lot lines and sizes(20160504) <br /> <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br />