My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_0523_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2016
>
2016_0523_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2017 3:26:37 PM
Creation date
6/8/2016 1:44:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br /> <br />1.Lots which are appropriate for their location and suitable for residential <br />development often have: <br /> <br />a.side lot lines that are approximately perpendicular or radial to front the lot line(s) <br />of the parcel(s) being subdivided, or <br /> <br />b.side lot lines that are approximately parallel to the side lot line(s) of the parcel(s) <br />being subdivided, or <br /> <br />c.side lot lines that are both approximately perpendicular or radial to the front lot <br />line(s) and approximately parallel to the side lot line(s) of the parcel(s) being <br />subdivided. <br /> <br />2.It is acknowledged, however, that property boundaries represent the limits of <br />property ownership, and subdivision applicants often cannot change those <br />boundaries to make them more regular if the boundaries have complex or unusual <br />alignments. Subdivisions of such irregularly-shaped parcels may be considered, <br />but the shapes of proposed new lots might be found to be too irregular, and <br />consequently, applications can be denied for failing to conform adequately to the <br />purposes for which simple, regular parcel shapes are considered most appropriate <br />and suitable for residential development. <br /> <br />3. <br />eighboring parcel and have the bulk of land area (i.e., <br />flag pole does not meet the required minimum lot width according to the standard <br />measurement procedure. <br /> <br />G:F:Double frontage lots shall not be permitted, except: <br /> <br />1.Where lots back upon a thoroughfare, in which case vehicular and pedestrian <br />access between the lots and the thoroughfare shall be prohibited, and (Ord. 216, 7- <br />5-1956) <br /> <br />2.Where topographic or other conditions render subdividing otherwise <br />unreasonable. Such double frontage lots shall have an additional depth of at least <br />twenty (20) feet greater than the minimum in order to allow space for a protective <br />screen planting along the back lot line and also in such instances vehicular and <br />pedestrian access between lots and the thoroughfare shall be prohibited. (Ord. <br />245, 5-101958) <br /> <br />H:G:Lots abutting upon a water course, drainage way, channel or stream shall have an <br />additional depth or width as required to assure house sites that meet shoreland ordinance <br />requirements and that are not subject to flooding. <br /> <br />I:H:In the subdividing of any land, due regard shall be shown for all natural features such as <br />tree growth, water courses, historic spots or similar conditions which, if preserved, will <br />add attractiveness and value to the proposed development. (Ord. 216, 7-5-1956; amd. <br />1995 Code) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.