My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_0425_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2016
>
2016_0425_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2016 2:29:13 PM
Creation date
6/8/2016 2:28:45 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Exhibit B <br /> <br />5) Trees that are going to be replanted have been designated on the plan but the types of trees that are going to <br />be planted should be determined and then approved by the city. <br />6) Some recalculations of the tree replacement formula may need to be made. Some trees within the proposed <br />street are being counted against the replacement values (2350, 2352, 313) which they may not have to be as <br />they are exempt, and conversely, some trees outside the construction limits (2225) are not being credited as <br />save trees.It really shouldn’t affect the final numbers too much as the 23 trees being planted will certainly <br />cover the requirements but some recalculations may be in order before the plan is approved. <br />7) Most trees identified as American elm on the inventory are most likely Siberian elm. This really is not an <br />issue just a clarification. <br />Mark Rehder <br />Certified Arborist MN-0256A <br />Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.