2016_0425_CCPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

concerns that the townhouse units at the margins of the property would gle family Midland Grove, approximately 170 units, was approved in July 1967. PF456: (1968) Approval of subdivision of the larger, former parcel into what became Midland Grove Condominiums and the property that continues to be addressed as 2025 County Rd B; approval of relocation of the house which stands on 2025 County Rd B from the parcel that became Midland Grove. PF09-002: (2009) Comp Plan amendment, rezoning, and PUD for 4-story, 77-unit PUD. Planning Commission recommended approval (4 3); City Council vote (3 2) in favor of the Comp Plan failed to achieve the 4/5ths supermajority vote to pass. PCA LANNING OMMISSION CTION The public hearing for this application was held by the Planning Commission on January 6, 2016. Prior to taking action on the application, the discussion was tabled to allow the applicant to commission a traffic study so that the traffic impacts of various development scenarios. On April 6, the Planning Commission received the traffic study, resumed its discussion, and voted 6 1 to recommend approval of the requested Comprehensive Land Use Plan map change, and unanimously recommended approval of the requested rezoning. Given the uncertain timing of the resumed discussion, property owners who received the public hearing notice also received a courtesy notice of PO ROPOSAL VERVIEW 1 The requested comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) and rezoning would facilitate development 2 of any of the permitted uses in the High-Density Residential-1 (HDR-1) zoning district with a 3 maximum residential dwelling unit density of 24 units per acre. Having a total area of about 2¼ 4 acres, the subject property could potentially be developed with up to 54 dwelling units. The 5 current proposal is to develop a 54-unit assisted living facility, but rezoning actions cannot be 6 tied to specific proposals. The traffic study analyzed the proposed development, a generic multi- 7 family development under the proposed HDR-1 zoning, and a generic residential development 8 -Density Residential zoning district, and found that no roadway 9 network improvements would be necessary for any development scenarios in order to maintain 10 an acceptable level of service at all intersections in the project area. The development proposal, 11 the staff analysis presented in the Request for Planning Commission Action, and approved 12 minutes of the public hearing are included with this report as RCA Exhibit A, and the traffic 13 study report and draft minutes of the , are included 14 with this report as RCA Exhibit B. 15 SPCLUPMC UMMARY OF THE ROPOSED OMPREHENSIVE AND SE LAN AP HANGE 16 14.f PF16-001_RCA_20160425 (002) Page 2 of 4