My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-06-21_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda_Packet
>
2016
>
2016-06-21_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2016 10:06:39 AM
Creation date
6/20/2016 10:06:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Identify & implement preferred approach to providing staff and/or consulting capacity for <br />28 <br />– In Progress <br />economic development (21) <br />29 <br />Business Friendly Practices & Reputation <br />30 <br />Policy <br />Clear Incentive policies & processes (23) – <br />31 <br />Policy & Acquisition/Redevelopment Support <br />“Shovel Ready” sites (22) – <br />32 <br />Policy <br />Listen & adjust policies that aren’t working (21)- <br />33 <br />Financing/Incentives <br />34 <br />- Policy <br />Clear policies: business subsidy, TIF, tax abatement (23) <br />35 <br />Redevelopment, Reuse, Revitalization (other areas, facades) <br />36 <br />- Proactive <br />Engage property owners, affected business owners & residents (23) <br />37 <br />38 <br />2016 Staff Capacity – Policy Development <br />39 <br />Staff currently has general business subsidy policies and TIF policies that have been provided by <br />40 <br />Springsted, Inc. Staff also has a baseline framework for incentive policies, including a Twin Lakes <br />41 <br />Incentive Policy from 2008 that can be used as a starting point. To adaptthe policies for current <br />42 <br />needs, staff would need assistance from a consultant. <br />43 <br />44 <br />The EDA will need to determine which policies should be reviewed/created in 2016 and which can <br />45 <br />be reviewed in 2017. The EDA could consider a larger Business Subsidy Policy that encompasses all <br />46 <br />possible incentive options. Appropriate funds to work with a consultant on developing policies in <br />47 <br />$10,000. <br />2016 may fall in the realm of <br />48 <br />49 <br />2016 Staff Capacity – Acquisition/Redevelopment Support <br />50 <br />The EDA has taken a more active interest in land purchases and shovel-ready programs. Staff has <br />51 <br />the capacity, with the assistance of our real estate attorney/other consultants, to project-manage sites <br />52 <br />that are in various stages of acquisition. <br />53 <br />54 <br />Staff suggests that in 2016 the EDA consider allocating dollars toward developing a framework for <br />55 <br />site acquisition. A framework will help Staff and the EDA determine where the priority areas are, <br />56 <br />when to bring a site forward to the EDA for consideration, and articulate when a consultant should <br />57 <br />be engaged. A consultant would need to be hired to assist in developing such a framework, and staff <br />58 <br />$10,000 <br />estimates the cost at . There would also be additional costs for specialized consultants to <br />59 <br />assist in the acquisition process as needed. <br />60 <br />61 <br />2016 Staff Capacity – Proactive Economic Development <br />62 <br />The EDA has identified as a priority a heightened level of engagement in various areas of economic <br />63 <br />development as indicated by the initiative titled, “Resident Oriented/Neighborhood Commercial.” <br />64 <br />One area where this is already happening is in Southeast Roseville where staff is working with a <br />65 <br />multi-jurisdictional planning group to determine the best way to approach the Rice/Larpenteur <br />66 <br />corridor revitalization. The group is also working on a visioning process that would include efforts <br />67 <br />to engage the surrounding community. At a City Council meeting in April, staff outlined several <br />68 <br />visioning options for Southeast Roseville and estimated the cost at that time to range from $20,000 - <br />69 <br />, <br />$50,000 depending on the level of staff involvement. Although the cost of visioning, engagement, <br />70 <br />and reinvestment is unknown at this time, staff suggests that the EDA consider setting aside a funds <br />71 <br />in 2016 to continue the Southeast Roseville visioning efforts already underway. The suggested <br />72 <br />$40,000. <br />amount of funds to be budgeted fall in the middle range of visioning at, <br />73 <br />74 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.