My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA_Minutes_2016_05_25
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
EDA_Minutes_2016_05_25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2016 4:16:34 PM
Creation date
6/27/2016 4:16:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RHRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Monday, May 25, 2016 <br />Page 6 <br />1 questioned if it was receiving the extent of services it wanted; and whether <br />2 the Chambers also served as a partners in workforce efforts. <br />3 <br />4 President Roe noted the Chambers typically sent ambassadors to Roseville <br />5 events to make connections with businesses, and suggested that may serve <br />6 as a way to begin those connections (e.g. Twin Cities North Chamber of <br />7 Commerce). <br />8 <br />9 Ms. King noted that Chambers could be proactive and strategic in <br />10 developing business retention; and serve to help the City know their <br />11 business community and future real estate trajectories. Ms. King noted that <br />12 other Chambers were more reactive welcoming new businesses and getting <br />13 to know them. Ms. King suggested Roseville talking through an approach <br />14 that included both proactive and reactive aspects. <br />15 <br />16 President Roe noted there was an historical connection in Roseville with <br />17 both Chambers. <br />18 <br />19 Ms. King advised that she had interviewed both Chambers before tonight’s <br />20 presentation, and had provided marketing examples as referenced in <br />21 meeting packets. <br />22 <br />23 Financing and incentives <br />24 Member Willmus asked if site control came into the picture. <br />25 <br />26 Ms. King responded affirmatively, noting she included it in the <br />27 redevelopment area should the city need to assemble parcels to create <br />28 developments wanted by the community. In the case of private owners, <br />29 Ms. King noted that it shaped what the city got; but site control by the city <br />30 allowed it to have greater control of the outcome. <br />31 <br />32 Ms. King suggested setting up measurements upfront before economic <br />33 development investments and reporting; and when doing development <br />34 agreements write that information requirement into the agreement, <br />35 especially if receiving subsidies from the state that require that reporting <br />36 data. <br />37 <br />38 Workforce/talent <br />39 Ms. King noted that this was the highest need identified in the region’s and <br />40 Roseville’s business retention survey, and at business council meetings or <br />41 other public events where this is discussed. Ms. King noted that this was <br />42 one way the city could help make connections for employers (e.g. interns <br />43 or employees through connections with local colleges and universities). <br />44 Ms. King noted this involved knowing the resources and contact to call for <br />45 specific situations, and allowed the city to be responsive. <br />46 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.