My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-06-01_PC_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Agendas
>
2016-06-01_PC_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2016 4:12:58 PM
Creation date
7/11/2016 4:12:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning CommissionMeeting <br />Minutes –Wednesday, May 4, 2016 <br />Page 3 <br />other advisory commissions and from the public through many formal and informal <br />99 <br />discussions over the next 18 months. <br />100 <br />Chair Boguszewski noted the City Council’s wish to be very transparent and invite <br />101 <br />multiple opportunities for public input. <br />102 <br />As part of the re-examination process, Member Daireasked if that would include looking <br />103 <br />at the boundaries of quasi-planning districts or based within the context of the Community <br />104 <br />Engagement Commission’s recent report and recommendation to the City Council on <br />105 <br />neighborhood associations to connectpeople within neighborhoods or defining <br />106 <br />geographic territories. <br />107 <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that this had not come up for discussion in-house by staff at this point, <br />108 <br />but the quasi planning districts remained intact as they appear in the current <br />109 <br />comprehensive plan,even while recognizing they may not necessarily be in line with <br />110 <br />neighborhood areas.Mr. Lloyd noted that this could and should certainly be part of <br />111 <br />discussions and considerations at various levels if the City Council chose to prompt that <br />112 <br />type of evaluation. <br />113 <br />Member Daire stated what had sparked his question was Mr. Lloyds comments venturing <br />114 <br />into social and health issues, which was much more personal and perhaps a <br />115 <br />neighborhood concern, looking to other organizational models beyond geographical <br />116 <br />interests. <br />117 <br />Mr. Lloyd agreed, noting that was true specially if members of the community were at a <br />118 <br />point they were ready to coalesce into neighborhood groups if there was an obvious <br />119 <br />community drive to incorporate them. <br />120 <br />With the Community Engagement Commission’s Neighborhood Association <br />121 <br />recommendations just recently reported to the City Council, Ms. Collins clarified that the <br />122 <br />City Council was in the process of individual review and would be having a conversation <br />123 <br />in the near future about those very issues; suggesting commissioners stay-tuned for <br />124 <br />those future discussions of the City Council. <br />125 <br />Chair Boguszewski noted his main concern in any decision was that any neighborhood <br />126 <br />boundaries be realistic and not impose artificial boundaries and call it a “neighborhood” <br />127 <br />when not arising on its own from commonality of a particular neighborhood. <br />128 <br />At the request of Member Kimble, Ms. Collins advised that the City of Roseville was <br />129 <br />involved with Greater Minneapolis/St. Paul efforts and their work, noting that staff was <br />130 <br />currently working specifically with them at this time on medical manufacturing initiatives <br />131 <br />and seeking for the State of MN to certify Roseville as a Manufacturing Hub and how the <br />132 <br />city can further foster that type of commercial interest.Ms. Collins reported that the City <br />133 <br />Councilhad just recently hired an Economic Development consultant to help strengthen <br />134 <br />those relationships. <br />135 <br />Through her experience with that organization, Member Kimble noted that they worked to <br />136 <br />benchmark various indicators among cities, with a separate program totrack and trend <br />137 <br />cities against each other; and provided a good opportunity to talk to other communities <br />138 <br />and cities, especially first-ring suburbs in what they were doing to prepare for their <br />139 <br />comprehensive plan updates.Member Kimble noted this could provide best management <br />140 <br />practices and reflect changes in how people live. <br />141 <br />Ms. Collins noted there were many avenues for comprehensive plan support, with staff <br />142 <br />attending many of them already; but stressed the importance of community engagement <br />143 <br />and public input desires from the Roseville community and maintaining the standards <br />144 <br />they expected today. <br />145 <br />At the request of Member Bull, Mr. Lloyd reviewed the previous process in updating the <br />146 <br />comprehensive plan, selecting a consultant with specific expertise in comprehensive <br />147 <br />plans and establishing the scope of the process, including type of and frequency of public <br />148 <br />input opportunities. Mr. Lloyd clarified that the City Council will be addressing the process <br />149 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.