2016-07-13_VB_Agenda_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

or adds significant excavation and engineering expense to make former house location suitable 89 for redevelopment if the existing foundation is not reused. 90 Roseville’s Development Review Committee(DRC) met on June 2, 2016, todiscuss this 91 application; the DRCdid not have any comments or concerns beyond the zoning considerations 92 discussed in this RVBA. 93 PC UBLIC OMMENT 94 At the time this report was prepared, Planning Division staff received one emailexpressing 95 concerns aboutthe variancerequest, but that email was retracted by its author after s/he received 96 further clarification about the proposal from the applicant. 97 RA ECOMMENDEDCTION 98 Adopt aresolutionapprovingvariancesto §1004.08of the City Code to allowthe proposed front 99 and rear yard encroachments, based on the proposed plans,the input offered during the public 100 hearing,and the comments and findings outlined in this report. 101 AA LTERNATIVE CTIONS 102 Pass a motion to table the requestfor future action. a.Tabling beyond July 25, 2016 103 may require extension of the 60-day action deadline established in Minn. Stat. §15.99 104 Adopt a resolution to deny the request. b.Denial should be supported by specific findings 105 of fact based on the Variance Board’sreview of the application, applicable zoning or 106 subdivision regulations, and the public record. 107 NS EXT TEPS 108 The decision of the Variance Board is final unless an appeal is filed. The appeal period remains 109 open for 10 days from the date of the decision, and an appeal may be made either by the 110 applicant or by another Roseville property owner. 111 An appeal must be submitted in writing to the City Manager by noon on July 25, 2016,for a 112 hearing before the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 113 Attachments:A:Area mapProposed plans C: Aerial photoDraft resolution B:D: Prepared by:Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd 651-792-7073 planning@cityofroseville.com PF16-017_RVBA_20160713 Page 4of 4