My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-05-04_PC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-05-04_PC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2016 4:17:06 PM
Creation date
7/11/2016 4:17:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, May 4, 2016 <br />Page 9 <br />However, Chair Boguszewski noted that this zoning change would allow this mass to <br />401 <br />develop, as well as theoretically an even denser mass than this proposal, with Mr. <br />402 <br />Paschke agreeing with that statement. <br />403 <br />Member Daire clarified, with staff’s concurrence, that directly across the street from this <br />404 <br />site, with single-family uses, it would be similar to the past conversation for the project at <br />405 <br />Cleveland Avenue and County Road B, where that request had been for HDR with MDR <br />406 <br />preferred as a transition between those land uses. <br />407 <br />Mr. Paschke agreed that in that situation, the request had been for up-zoning to a level <br />408 <br />far greater than it was currently zoned; while this one was already zoned HDR, and <br />409 <br />simply sought rezoning to slightly increase the density from HDR-1 to HDR-2, opining <br />410 <br />that didn’t create as distinct of a difference as the previous example. <br />411 <br />Applicant Representative(s) <br />412 <br />Aaron Bakker, Good Samaritan Society, Sioux Falls, SD, Construction Design <br />413 <br />Consultant; Nathan Kraft, Good Samaritan Society, Construction Consultant; and <br />414 <br />Enrico Williams, Kaas Wilson Architects, Bloomington, MN <br />415 <br />Aaron Bakker <br />416 <br />In addition to those questions already raised, Mr. Bakker expressed the team’s <br />417 <br />willingness to answer any questions related to the project. <br />418 <br />Regarding the concern raise regarding the proposed project developing into a denser <br />419 <br />project, Mr. Bakker stated the history of Good Samaritan Society in not overdeveloping <br />420 <br />their project sites. Having maintained some of their properties for 40-50 years, Mr. Bakker <br />421 <br />stated that he didn’t see any higher density on this site than that proposed, with the <br />422 <br />development team interested in providing more green space. Mr. Bakker noted this <br />423 <br />resulted in proposing underground parking versus above ground parking; with the intent <br />424 <br />to make this site a friendly, walkable site, including a walkway across the parcel. <br />425 <br />At the request of Member Gitzen, Mr. Bakker confirmed that Good Samaritan owned the <br />426 <br />property when it was previously a nursing home prior to demolition. <br />427 <br />At the request of Member Kimble, Mr. Bakker confirmed that tax credits were part of the <br />428 <br />financing for the project’s development, anticipating application for credits for the fall <br />429 <br />2016 round. <br />430 <br />At the request of Member Daire, Mr. Bakker advised that, while unsure of the property’s <br />431 <br />long-term history, he was aware that Good Samaritan had owned the property when the <br />432 <br />former nursing home use had been demolished; and throughout the seven-year vacant <br />433 <br />period following to-date. <br />434 <br />Member Daire asked if the changing market for housing had made this particular <br />435 <br />development seem attractive at this time. <br />436 <br />Mr. Bakker responded that it had, and following a recent market study that indicated <br />437 <br />senior housing was needed in Roseville, this seemed to be a good location since it was <br />438 <br />already owned by the applicant, and provided nearby and walkable amenities. Mr. Bakker <br />439 <br />noted that the adjacent bus line also made this site attractive for affordable housing as <br />440 <br />well. At the request of Member Daire, Mr. Bakker confirmed that the building would be all <br />441 <br />independent living units, with no assisted living units included. <br />442 <br />At the request of Chair Boguszewski as to what “affordable” indicated, Mr. Bakker <br />443 <br />responded that it made some funding through tax credits possible, with the guidelines for <br />444 <br />those applicable for affordable housing based on low income, total assets and other <br />445 <br />resources of those applying. <br />446 <br />While not knowing all aspects of this property, Chair Boguszewski noted his initial <br />447 <br />reaction to the projected elevations for the property caused him to be concerned with the <br />448 <br />massing shown in provisional drawings, especially to the south and east, and abutting <br />449 <br />single-family homes. Chair Boguszewski asked if there were alternatives to flip the <br />450 <br />footprint, or if this was the only workable placement. <br />451 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.