My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Res_11337
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
11xxx
>
11300
>
Res_11337
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 3:26:22 PM
Creation date
7/22/2016 4:23:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Meeting Date
7/18/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
11337
Resolution Title
MEMORIALIZING THE DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 1926 GLUEK LANE INTO TWO PARCELS
Resolution Date Passed
7/18/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of' Ramsey, State of Minnesota, was held on the 18t" day of July 2016 at <br />6:00 p.m. <br />The following T✓Iembers were present: Etten, McGehee, Laliberte and Roe <br />and Willmus was abser�t. <br />Council Membe:r McGehee introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 11337 <br />A RESOLUTION MF:MORIALIZING THE DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL <br />OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 1926 GLUEK LANE INTO TWO PARCELS <br />(PF16-014) <br />WHEREAS, thf, City of Roseville has received a valid application for approval of the <br />requested minor subdivision; and <br />WHEREAS, thf; Roseville City Council, at its regular meeting on July 11, 2016, reviewed <br />the application along with the record from public proceedings, including memoranda and City <br />staff reports and public consideration by and between the City Council, and denied the <br />application based on th�e following factual findings: <br />• The existing storm water runoff and drainage issues in the area are extreme; <br />• The proposal daes not meet minimum requirements of the City Code for lot width; and <br />• The additional runoff from the residential development intended for the subdivided parcel <br />might be injuria�us to other homes in the surrounding neighborhood. <br />AND WHEREE�S, said findings of fact underpinning the denial were reported to the <br />applicant in a letter datE:d July 12, 2016; <br />NOW, THEREI ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />Minnesota, that the application discussed herein was denied on July 11, 2016. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Laliberte and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Etten, <br />McGehee, Laliberte arid Roe and none voted against. <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.