My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Res_11338
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
11xxx
>
11300
>
Res_11338
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 3:26:21 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 2:21:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Meeting Date
7/18/2016
Resolution #
11338
Resolution Title
MEMORIALIZING THE DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 1861 GLUEK LANE INTO
Resolution Date Passed
7/18/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, was held on the 18�' day of July 2016 at <br />6:00 p.m. <br />The following Members were present: Etten, McGehee, Laliberte and Roe <br />and Willmus was absent. <br />Council Member McGehee introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 11338 <br />A RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING THE DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL <br />OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 1861 GLUEK LANE INTO TWO PARCELS <br />(PF16-016) <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has received a valid application far approval of the <br />requested minor subdivision; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council, at its regular meeting on July 11, 2016, <br />reviewed the application along with the record from public proceedings, including memoranda <br />and City staff reports and public consideration by and between the City Council, and denied the <br />application based on the following factual findings: <br />• The additional runoff from the residential development intended for the subdivided parcel <br />might be injurious to other homes in the surrounding neighborhood. <br />AND WHEREAS, said findings of fact underpinning the denial were reported to the <br />applicant in a letter dated July 12, 2016; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />Minnesota, that the application discussed herein was denied on July 11, 2016. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Laliberte and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Etten, <br />McGehee, Laliberte and Roe and none voted against. <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.