My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0718
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2016 3:26:11 PM
Creation date
7/26/2016 10:10:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/18/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
my education at University of Wisconsin Madison engineering school about significant digits and <br />rounding errors, 0.062% is not significant and is a rounding error. Even if the development area <br />was doubled, it is still not a significant addition. <br />Closin� comments <br />Subdivisions in this "area" are actually quite common. I have defined an area land between <br />Cleveland and Fairview and between County Road B and Highway 36. While not an exhaustive <br />list, here is the numbers I calculated from Ramsey County Aerial maps and City of Roseville data. <br />Year of assessment Number of Homes Homes on Gluek Lane <br />1953 2 1 <br />1973 Many (high density development) 22 <br />1985 Many 27 <br />1991 Many 30 <br />2003 Many 32 <br />2016 260 34 <br />The denial of this subdivision is unprecedented and not supported by fact. <br />For precedent and context, I encourage you to search the minutes of the two lot subdivisions <br />that have taken place in my 12 years living in this community. The most recent one was for 1937 <br />Gluek. Council Member McGehee, you may remember this one, since you seconded the motion <br />and contributed to unanimous support of the division. <br />The City Council's mission statement is as follows: <br />To provide ethical, efficient, and responsive local government, in support of community <br />aspirations, guided by the policies of the City Council, and implemented by the professiona! staff, <br />to ensure that Roseville remains strong, vibrant and sustainable for current and future <br />generations. <br />It was disappointing to me that the professional staff to which the Council looks for guidance <br />and implementation was dismissed, as they recommended approval for this subdivision. The <br />Council set the rules, I worked with the city staff using their professional judgement to deem <br />that this submission follows the rules of the City of Roseville. Yet, the rules appear to have <br />changed through this subdivision denial. <br />I once again urge you to remove item 8a from the consent agenda, have a member of the <br />majority voting members move for reconsideration, and approve this code compliant <br />subdivision motion as is recommended by your staff, and supported by the facts. <br />Regards, <br />_ � <br />ad Kol nd 926 Gluek Lane, Roseville, MN 55113 <br />_ __- ___ __ _ ___ <br />1926 Gluek Lane Minor Subdivision request PF16-014 response to facts of denial <br />S�Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.