CC_Minutes_2016_0718 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

my education at University of Wisconsin Madison engineering school about significant digits and rounding errors, 0.062% is not significant and is a rounding error. Even if the development area was doubled, it is still not a significant addition. Closin� comments Subdivisions in this "area" are actually quite common. I have defined an area land between Cleveland and Fairview and between County Road B and Highway 36. While not an exhaustive list, here is the numbers I calculated from Ramsey County Aerial maps and City of Roseville data. Year of assessment Number of Homes Homes on Gluek Lane 1953 2 1 1973 Many (high density development) 22 1985 Many 27 1991 Many 30 2003 Many 32 2016 260 34 The denial of this subdivision is unprecedented and not supported by fact. For precedent and context, I encourage you to search the minutes of the two lot subdivisions that have taken place in my 12 years living in this community. The most recent one was for 1937 Gluek. Council Member McGehee, you may remember this one, since you seconded the motion and contributed to unanimous support of the division. The City Council's mission statement is as follows: To provide ethical, efficient, and responsive local government, in support of community aspirations, guided by the policies of the City Council, and implemented by the professiona! staff, to ensure that Roseville remains strong, vibrant and sustainable for current and future generations. It was disappointing to me that the professional staff to which the Council looks for guidance and implementation was dismissed, as they recommended approval for this subdivision. The Council set the rules, I worked with the city staff using their professional judgement to deem that this submission follows the rules of the City of Roseville. Yet, the rules appear to have changed through this subdivision denial. I once again urge you to remove item 8a from the consent agenda, have a member of the majority voting members move for reconsideration, and approve this code compliant subdivision motion as is recommended by your staff, and supported by the facts. Regards, _ � ad Kol nd 926 Gluek Lane, Roseville, MN 55113 _ __- ___ __ _ ___ 1926 Gluek Lane Minor Subdivision request PF16-014 response to facts of denial S�Page