Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 11, 2016 <br />Page 28 <br />preserving current tree cover, and expressed appreciation that the City Council <br />now had in place a revised ordinance to enforce that to significantly impact this <br />and surrounding properties. Mayor Roe further noted there were stormwater re- <br />quirements in place, not only in city code, but also through the Rice Creek Water- <br />shed District and other jurisdictions including the State of Minnesota that any pro- <br />ject would need to meet for approval. Under those circumstances and realities, <br />Mayor Roe spoke in support of this application. <br />Councilmember McGehee noted the city's current visioning and comprehensive <br />plan tacit acknowledgement for preservation of neighborhood character, but <br />opined there was not enforcement mechanism and without that it was difficult to <br />defend the position. As a result of the 2007 proposal as referenced by Mayor <br />Roe, Councilmember McGehee clarified there was no action taken on small or <br />large lot area; and expressed her interest in undertaking such action especially in <br />this part of the community. Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of doing <br />so in the near future, based on the community interest frequently expressed in pre- <br />serving neighborhoods. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />b. Request for Approval of a Minor Subdivision at 1926 Gluek Lane into Two <br />Parcels (PF16-014) <br />Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd briefly summarized this request for subdivision of an <br />existing parcel into two parcels, creating one new parcel for future development <br />for a single-family, detached home, as detailed in the RCA and related attach- <br />ments presented. Mr. Lloyd noted the actual alignment of the new property line <br />remained pending more detailed survey data, but clarified that the homeowner <br />was interested in tying the setback from the existing pavement edge to the current <br />garage, and any configuration would retain the intent to meet minimum rear prop- <br />erty lines for width, depth and square footage. Mr. Lloyd asked that the City <br />Council's review evaluate the general property boundary alignment for conformi- <br />ty with the recently-adopted code amendment for flexibility with lot irregularities. <br />Addressing the written comment from area property owners (RCA Exhibit D), <br />Mr. Lloyd addressed those highlighted stormwater drainage issues compared with <br />platted areas running throughout the neighborhood, and impacts found from <br />stormwater generated by developments further south (Roselawn Avenue) moving <br />north and surcharges north in several locations of easement/infrastructure areas. <br />Mr. Lloyd noted the written comments were not opposed to either Gluek Lane <br />subdivision application, but just wanted to make sure their concerns were brought <br />forward as either project went through design/permitting phases of construction. <br />