My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-06-28_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-06-28_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2016 3:58:43 PM
Creation date
7/27/2016 3:58:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/28/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Correct to read: "Mr. Johnson opined that they are as aggressive, and <br /> mentioned several joint..." <br /> ■ Page 13, Lines 547 - 548 (Heimerl) <br /> Correct to read: "...A-Line[ bus] rapid btts transit eame ann passenger <br /> numbers <br /> ■ Page 13, Line 550 (Heimerl) <br /> Correct to read: "Green" Line rather than "Grey" Line <br /> Ayes: 6 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 4. Communication Items <br /> Public Works Director Culver provided additional comments and a brief review <br /> and update on projects and maintenance activities listed in the staff report dated <br /> June 28, 2016. <br /> Discussion included recognition by commissioners that even though funding for <br /> some of the shorter sidewalk/pathway connections was not coming from Safe <br /> Routes to Schools, similar criteria was being used; identification on the map of <br /> missing gaps and scheduled pathway infrastructure improvements as part of the <br /> annual construction season when possible. Staff clarified that some of the <br /> connections had been made through use of remaining Park Renewal Program <br /> bond funds and timing for that spending obligation as part of bond protocol for <br /> 2016 and 2017 as possible. <br /> Specific to last month's tree replacement discussion, clarification was sought <br /> from staff on what was actually involved in relocating trees, their size and <br /> species; and whether during mass grading efforts; and success rates in moving <br /> larger trees depending on the size of their root structure and overall health. <br /> 5. Stormwater Impact Fund <br /> Mr. Culver deferred to Environmental Engineer Ryan Johnson for this <br /> presentation of a proposed Draft Impact Fund (policy) and Draft Management <br /> Standards. <br /> Mr. Johnson advised that while current city's stormwater management policies <br /> and practices provided standards and guidance to avoid degradation of water <br /> bodies, parts were still missing and needed updating, thus staffs recommendation <br /> for implementing a Stormwater Impact Fund. Mr. Johnson noted this fund would <br /> allow residents that apply for a Residential Stormwater Permit (ReSWP) to <br /> purchase treatment through a city-installed regional system in lieu of providing <br /> treatment onsite through rain barrels, raingardens, or other site management <br /> systems. Mr. Johnson noted the fund would also allow developers unable to treat <br /> stormwater onsite to purchase treatment credits based on a dollar per cubic foot <br /> rate. Mr. Johnson noted there was no city current cit policy in place to address <br /> Page 2 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.