My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 2:32:28 PM
Creation date
8/23/2016 9:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/21/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REDA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, June 21, 2016 <br />Page 14 <br />that staff provided information on available loan programs several times a <br />year. <br />Member Willmus requested more information on the four loan applications <br />that didn't move forward; and also asked for any changing data from those <br />other communities listed in Attachment B. Member Willmus asked if activity <br />was more about the economy versus interest rates. <br />Ms. Kelsey offered to gather that information on other communities for the <br />next REDA meeting, but noted their activity was similar to that seen in <br />Roseville. Ms. Kelsey further reported that the City of Fridley had just <br />modified their loan program and was now seeing an uptick in applications, <br />while it had similarly been comparable to that of Roseville's activity. Ms. <br />Kelsey noted the City of Little Canada was prepared to follow Roseville's lead <br />on their loan programs. Specific to the four loans not going forward, Ms. <br />Kelsey reported that one wanted more than $40,000, one didn't qualify for loan <br />to value on the home, and two decided against doing the improvement. Ms. <br />Kelsey advised that this information was available to staff from the HRC on a <br />monthly basis. <br />Member McGehee noted that part of the value these loan programs for long- <br />term Roseville residents was to use these funds for health-related reasons such <br />as universal design to allow them to age in place versus increasing their overall <br />property values, even though that may be a result as well. Member McGehee <br />reiterated her interest in keeping those options at the forefront to provide <br />incentives for people to improve their homes. <br />Specific to loan to value at 115%, President Roe noted Roseville's program <br />already allows loan to value higher than the private loan market, offering <br />something different than the private market. President Roe noted that looking <br />at the interest rate may also be a factor in this type of loan rather in addition to <br />being able to borrow more money. <br />At the request of Member McGehee, Ms. Kelsey confirmed that this loan <br />program also works for those on fixed incomes, but noted loan programs <br />through Ramsey County offered better options based on income-qualifications, <br />deferred loan funds, and forgiveness of loans after ten years. <br />At the request of Member Willmus, Ms. Kelsey clarified that any government <br />entities get second or lower positions on loans; and noted the city had yet to <br />have a loan default. <br />d. Move-up Housing Discussion <br />Ms. Kelsey reviewed move-up housing opportunities and initiatives as part of <br />Roseville's 2016 priority plan as detailed in the staff report and Attachment A. <br />Ms. Kelsey noted the first Wheaton Woods building permit application had <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.