My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 2:32:28 PM
Creation date
8/23/2016 9:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/21/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REDA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, June 21, 2016 <br />Page 18 <br />Member Etten noted additional information could be gleaned through a great <br />option for a tour, such as done by the RHRA prior to their dissolution. <br />For those properties guided HDR, Member Willmus noted the need to consider <br />the different uses that entailed as well. If the REDA decided to step back from <br />HDR and create more MDR parcels, Member Willmus opined a lot of these <br />parcels may have other uses on them, but would need guidance for future uses. <br />Member Etten stated his understanding of that consideration. <br />President Roe recognized that transitioning from HDR to MDR would involve <br />guiding those parcels for other zoning and uses. <br />Member McGehee stated she had never been a fan of HDR-2 zoning <br />designations. <br />Ms. Kelsey referenced Attachment C and parcels east of I-35W and north of <br />Cleveland Avenue (Cherrywood Point) currently designated HDR-2. Ms. <br />Kelsey clarified that there were a few parcels designated HDR-1, but meeting <br />HDR-2 designation but not rezoned through the comprehensive plan <br />amendment even though at a higher density than currently allowed. <br />Ms. Collins noted Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd had alluded to that in his <br />initial overview of comprehensive plan update discussions. <br />President Roe noted the current comprehensive plan had one HDR designation <br />overall. <br />Member McGehee stated her primary objection for HDR-2 was maximum <br />allowed heights in some places, as well as maximum impervious surfaces; but <br />noted in principle she didn't have opposition to HDR-2 if not allowing for an <br />unusually tall structure covering all the space. <br />President Roe noted that as rezoning and individual applications come forward <br />and part of the comprehensive plan update process, changes to height <br />limitations could be changed in the plan itself or other parts in a particular <br />zone. President Roe suggested those discussions be held before rezoning any <br />existing HDR-1 or HDR-2 parcels, recognizing that rezoning isn't done before <br />updating the comprehensive plan. President Roe suggested doing it all as a <br />package deal. <br />Executive Director Trudgeon concurred, clarifying the need for timing of that <br />with comprehensive plan process and the need to do so soon if that was their <br />desire, or whether to let the process go through to add mare MDR properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.