My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
EDA_Minutes_2016_06_21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 2:32:28 PM
Creation date
8/23/2016 9:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/21/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REDA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, June 21, 2016 <br />Page 8 <br />President Roe identified apparent next steps for the body as recognized: <br />A) Develop Policies and Processes <br />B) If and when unique opportunities come along, have funds available to take <br />advantage of those situations. <br />President Roe suggested the REDA may want to consider at 2017 levy that was <br />beyond just keeping the lights on, and determine it was prudent to accumulate <br />funds ahead of time for potential opportunities that might arise. <br />Executive Director Trudgeon noted 2016 priorities identified in tonight's <br />presentation, and their concentration on policy and costs as identified; and <br />sought feedback from the REDA if they found anything missing or anything <br />they thought should be deleted or deferred. <br />As far as the $40,000 allocated for SE Roseville's additional visioning, <br />Member Willmus asked what the city would receive for that money. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that the intent was for a small area redevelopment plan, <br />with different scales possible, from a process using a mix of the Dale Street <br />CDI visioning, listening sessions, and other community engagement option for <br />facilitating the discussion. <br />Ms. Collins noted the $40,000 estimated cost represented a mid-range cost for <br />such a small area plan. <br />Of the things listed that the REDA may want to look at, President Roe opined <br />that the SE Roseville visioning remained an unknown, while the others <br />discussed identified funding from two sources. <br />Member Etten questioned if the REDA needed a$10,000 consultant to assist <br />with development of business subsidy policies when staff would be tasked <br />with getting that information together for and with them, in addition to some <br />things the consultant may bring to the table. <br />Ms. Collins responded that when she first came on board in the Community <br />Development Department, her predecessor had left correspondence with <br />Springsted showing eight examples of business subsidy policies. Ms. Collins <br />noted there were a variety of options out there, and one or more of those <br />models could be used to model and tailor one specifically for Roseville. <br />However, Ms. Collins noted that depended on the degree of incentive policy <br />put together by the REDA for those consultant services. Ms. Collins opined <br />she didn't think it would cost $10,000 for that consulting fee, but had <br />identified the maximum amount to ensure the REDA received a quality <br />product. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.