CC_Minutes_2016_0822 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, August 22, 2016 Page 34 the city to-date to meet with representatives of WJR Architects, allowing the re- mainder of those issues to bring the building into compliance. With the water meter being pulled from the building by the city negating plumb- ing corrections being completed; and the Fire Department wanting to schedule the sprinkler hydrostatic test yet this week, Mr. Martin stated his difficulty in under- standing that contrast. Mr. Martin further noted the toilets couldn't be hooked u on site without water, making it impossible for his client to comply, and not mov- ing the ball forward for anyone. Mr. Martin provided photographic evidence as a bench handout, attached hereto and made a part heYeof, disputing those photos included in the staff report, opin- ing they overstated the current situation and questioning staff motivation other than to shut down this business, kick out the tenant, and throw 5-6 employees out of work. Mr. Martin compared his photos with those of staff, opining that staff's report and photos were misleading at best compared with corrections made to- date by the property owner and/or tenant. Mr. Martin challenged the City Council to consider staff's overstatement of the situation indicating a lack of cooperation by Mr. Dorso. Specific to photo attachment W and his comparison photo, Mr. Martin noted this area of the building showing damaged ceiling panels had not been occupied for a long time; but because of the requirement to replace the panels, his client had complied, advising they had been replaced for some time; but no follow-up had been provided to the City's Building Department due to his client's perception of their lack of cooperation. Had this material provided to the City Council been submitted to him and his client in advance of tonight's meeting, Mr. Martin ad- vised that he could have saved the Building Department the embarrassment of giving the City Council an impression that their photos were what the building currently looked like. Regarding what his client would like to see happen, Mr. Martin asked that they'd like the city's promises to be kept; and for staff to complete their review of the code analysis provided by their expert analysis as submitted; and then for staff to meet with his client and those experts to explain and work out differences; at which point his client could complete the work to bring the building into compli- ance within a reasonable time. Mr. Martin applauded the apparent willingness of the Fire Department all along in working out the issues in a cooperative way. However, Mr. Martin questioned the Building Code Enforcement staff's apparent lack of willingness to garner that same cooperation. Mr. Martin asked the City Council to order the Building Code Enforcement Of- ficer to work WITH rather than AGAINST the property owner in bringing the building into compliance. Mr. Martin noted the work done to-date, in part by the tenant, to clean up the building, resolve storage issues, and other compliance is-