Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 22, 2016 <br />Page 38 <br />there had been no update on progress made since starting corrections in June of <br />2016. Mr. Dorso noted he had immediately went to work on life safety issues <br />first, with the sprinkler system back up and functional in a week and hydrostati- <br />cally tested before realizing the Fire Department had to witness the test, scheduled <br />later this week as stated by Mr. Martin. Mr. Dorso expressed confidence that the <br />sprinkler would pass the test, but noted the additional $1,000 to prove that to the <br />Fire Department. <br />As noted by his tenant, Mr. Dorso noted ten years of accumulation of things in the <br />building during that time; and stated the difficulty in finding decent, viable ten- <br />ants to move into the building when they were aware it was soon to be redevel- <br />oped. <br />Mr. Dorso stated he wanted to sell the building, and had tried to do so for ten <br />years; and while working with the city to accomplish that multiple times, some- <br />thing always happened so the deal fell apart (e.g. tax increment funding criteria <br />not met). Mr. Dorso stated he didn't know what they wanted him to do, and <br />opined he was doing everything he could to bring the building into compliance. <br />However, Mr. Dorso asked if there was a hidden agenda here; but thanked the <br />City Council for listening. <br />At 10:00 p.m., Etten moved, McGehee seconded, extending the meeting curfew for completion <br />of this item. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee and Roe. <br />Nays: None. <br />Robert Murphy, 1996 Langton Lake Drive (two blocks north of subject <br />property) <br />For full disclosure, Mr. Murphy is a Planning Commissioner for the City of Rose- <br />ville, and serves as the Chair of the T�ariance Board. However, Mr. Murphy <br />clarified he was speaking solely as a Roseville resident, similarly to his neighbor, <br />Ms. Erickson. <br />Mr. Murphy spoke in support of abatement action; and thanked staff for their dili- <br />gence in fighting the fire during winter conditions last winter, and with difficulty <br />in reaching the trailers from their available accesses at Mount Ridge Road and <br />Cleveland Avenue. <br />Regarding the issues raised, specifically those life safety issues referenced by <br />Community Development and Fire Department staff and apparently not being ad- <br />dressed in a timely fashion, Mr. Murphy opined these not only applied to employ- <br />ees on site and their customers, but also to area residents, and any firefighter com- <br />ing in the door in an emergency. Mr. Murphy stated the building must meet state <br />and city codes for the safety of these individuals. <br />