Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />� � :� � x � X � x � x � � x � � � <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 12th day of September, <br />2016, at 6:00 p.m. <br />The following members were present: Laliberte, McGehee, Willmus, Etten and Roe and <br />the following were absent: none. <br />Member Willmus introduced the following resolution and moved its adop�ion: <br />RESOLUTION No. 11353 <br />RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR WHEELER STREET <br />CLOSURE AND ORDERING PUBLIC HEARING FOR IMPROVEMENT <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted August 22, 2016, a report has <br />been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the Wheeler Street Closure project, <br />and; <br />WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is <br />necessary, cost effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in <br />connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as <br />recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual <br />assessments for affected parcels. <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF, CITY OF <br />ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1. The City Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the <br />report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the <br />improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of <br />the improvement of $23,800. <br />2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 10`" day of <br />October, 2016, in the council chambers of the city hall at 6:00 p.m. and the City Engineer <br />shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by <br />law. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member <br />Etten, and upon a vote being taken thereon, �he following voted in favor thereof: <br />