Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />�10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />� 46 <br />RHRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, August 29, 2016 <br />Page 18 <br />While understanding previous staff positions, Member Laliberte asked if the <br />roles were known for the proposed reconfiguration in the office as well as <br />interaction in and with the community. <br />Ms. Collins advised that, depending on the option chosen by the REDA, those <br />job descriptions would be returned to the REDA and City Council for vetting, <br />and referenced Attachment C for some of those comparison examples. <br />Mayor Roe noted the variables for supervisory employees ninning overall <br />prograins, and- the day-to-day operational work of the organization. <br />Member Willmus asked if other efficiencies were possible or had been <br />explored by staff (e.g. legal counsel) to bY-ing those services together between <br />this body and the City Council. <br />Ms. Collins suggested all programs and services could use such a review, and <br />offered to work with City Manager Trudgeon on those efforts if so directed. <br />Mr. Trudgeon asked i� the intent wa"s, to align legal services for the City <br />Council and EDA, notirig he was in the mi�dle of contract negotiations at this <br />time. Not to say those services couldn't be : evaluated or reviewed, Mr. <br />Trudgeon noted the specialties of`EDA legal cotincil versus general municipal <br />attorney services: <br />McGeh�e moved, Willmus seco.nded,, adoption;'of REDA Resolution No. 2, <br />entitlec�, `�A Itesolution Adopting. a.Tax Levy in 2016, Collectible in 2017; <br />adopting nat=tb-exceed`_Option B; amencled at $365,585, r�emoving $200,000 <br />No one <br />to <br />_ _ <br />for public comment related to this item. <br />McGehee: ,spoke in support of this option based on her previous <br />ts, and concerns with staffing and the newness of the REDA, and need <br />n consultants :for some of that expertise at this point. <br />Member Willmus spoke in support of this preliminary budget. However, as <br />final determinations are made, Member Willmus stated his need to loolc at <br />additional information from staff more closely as to realigrunent and job <br />categories/classifications were intended moving forward. <br />Meinber Laliberte concurred, stating she would be looking to the next REDA <br />or City Council discussion on day-to-day operations moving forward and ways <br />to do more with current resources. <br />Member Etten agreed with Member McGehee that consultants were the best <br />way to proceed �e-for now until priorities and processes could be laid out for <br />