Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />I g <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />�13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />�17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />RHRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, August 29, 2016 <br />Page 35 <br />9. <br />feedbacic if and when it went before the Planning Commission for a formal <br />public hearing. <br />Member Laliberte aslced if it was possible to do something prior to a public <br />hearing at the Planning Commission. <br />As seconder of the motion, President Roe responded that, yes it was, and could <br />be done with a�l-process similar to that used when rezoning the Twin <br />Lakes Redevelopment Area, with at least one discussion laying out options, <br />and then considering different segments versus .the. whole and providing an <br />opportunity for input. <br />However, President Roe stated that � <br />the current motion, since the City Co� <br />public hearings for any rezoning <br />prompted by the city. President Roe <br />not just a public hearing,- Howe�E <br />would be totally inadequate for thi: <br />process. President Roe also noted <br />facilitated discussion versus the Twin <br />President Roe fiirther <br />appraisals on property <br />already been identifiee <br />through,t�at park bondi <br />President Roe opined <br />advantage of tke,,opporl <br />Member Lalibe� <br />� agreed to by the` <br />Will'snus movec% <br />211 1V 'McCa�rc <br />community:, en� <br />community-basE <br />what they woulc� <br />ioiea a a� <br />>rdered by <br />as part of <br />; prograrn. ; <br />at the rest <br />iity at this i <br />hool 'Distri <br />iversation ` <br />�ld '#�e�-be• ;his estimation in supporting <br />-il d"irects the Planning Commission on <br />ad comprehensive plan designation <br />ted that would in�olve an open house, <br />President Roe opined an open house <br />sue, and ':should be a' rnore involved <br />� in a consultant=driven or <br />that was staff-driven. <br />•ence in `this situation and previous <br />city, was that those properties had <br />: Park Renewal Program and funded <br />iile this was an opportunity for the city, <br />the pieces were not available to take <br />;. President Roe further opined that his <br />point of view and even having that <br />lcl get the city past this initial concern. <br />requested amendment to the motion, for clarification and <br />.ker and seconder of the motion, restated as follows: <br />�e secondecl, directing staff to NOT pursue acquisition of <br />Boulevard; and furthe� directing staff to initiate a full <br />ement as outlined broadly in this cliscussion for a <br />rezoning p�ocess to survey meircbe�s of that area as to <br />�e to see that pr�operty zonecl goi�cg forward. <br />Ayes: Willmus, Roe, Laliberte, and Etten <br />Nays e McGehee. <br />Motion carried. <br />Adjourn <br />Willmus moved, Laliberte seconded, adjourning the meeting at approxiinately 8:28 <br />p.m. <br />Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Roe, Laliberte, and Etten <br />