Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />RHRA Meeting <br />Minutes — Monday, August 29, 2016 <br />Page 4 <br />for negotiation; but if the REDA stated their minimum requirement was for <br />creation of ten new jobs even before the developer came before the REDA, the <br />city may lose developers with quality projects. <br />Member McGehee stated she had put a 3-4 job range, but agreed to move to <br />the creation of one job based on tonight's discussion. However, Member <br />McGehee stated she wanted to ensure jobs were permanent or long-term and <br />that this message caine across clearly to staff and developers. <br />President Roe agreed that, while the statutory <br />for job creation, the REDA had other criteri <br />types of jobs it was interested in creating. <br />Ms. Kvilvang noted, under this categ <br />for the developer to lceep jobs in pl,a <br />required to repay a portion of th.e si <br />returned to the REDA. <br />Member Laliberte stated she didn't fi <br />for discussion purposes, expressed <br />colleagues in not needing to.make a.r <br />Ms. I� <br />or ord: <br />Kvilvang r. <br />discretion b <br />; Member W <br />of a minimi <br />r";;i.,,; ,a � , -r; ,. <br />, the REDA cot <br />;typically five � <br />dy provided by <br />ber <br />g reminded the REDA that the� <br />;, and `therefore could deviate fi <br />the REDA- as a go�err�ing bo <br />�ted the REDA could deviatf <br />�� <br />�s; with <br />Ms. Kyilvang stated Ehler's <br />the number of jobs. , , <br />set a miniinum number <br />policy that defined the <br />define a time period <br />;s) or they would be <br />� citv that would be <br />�boiit the creation of teri jobs; and <br />afion for the comments of her <br />f ex�eptions to the policy. <br />were cra`�.ting a policy, not a law <br />rn t�iai policy. While the stat�rte <br />�d� to �state their preference, Ms. <br />or change that policy at their <br />to tie the REDA policy to creation <br />from the Board without objection. <br />Created <br />�osal was that the REDA not limit subsidies to <br />Mernber Etten ,agreed with the advice of Bhler's based on their expertise, <br />opining it was better not to tie jobs specifically to subsidies, with other criteria <br />available beyond jobs. Member Etten noted limiting subsidies to job creation <br />could hold back some preferred developments. <br />Member McGehee stated she thought the REDA should seek some good <br />paying jobs, but agreed to yield to the experience of Ehlers. <br />Meinber Laliberte advised she didn't comment on this in the survey, as she <br />was seeking more discussion as tonight, and found it helpful. <br />