My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-09-14_VB_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Variance Board
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Agendas
>
2016-09-14_VB_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2016 9:50:25 AM
Creation date
9/16/2016 9:50:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Variance Board
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DPZA <br />ETAILED ROPOSALAND ONING NALYSIS <br />1 <br />The applicant proposes to construct a porch roof over existing walk-out stairs at the rear of the <br />2 <br />home to keep rain water from falling into the stairs and entering the home through the door and, <br />3 <br />in the near future,to construct an additional parking stall adjacent to the driveway.The site plan <br />4 <br />and written narrative detailing the proposal areincluded with this report as Attachment C. <br />5 <br />City Code §1017.16(Shoreland Setbacks)requires most structures, including the proposed porch <br />6 <br />roof, to be set back a minimum of 75 feet from the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL, which is <br />7 <br />essentially the shoreline).Planning Division staff believes that the primary purposesfor such <br />8 <br />setbacks are aesthetic in nature; to provide some uniformity in structure location and to minimize <br />9 <br />the appearance of building mass in the natural environment of the lake.This same section of the <br />10 <br />zoning code requires impervious, paved surfaces to be set back at least 30 feet fromtheOHWL. <br />11 <br />City Code §1017.26 (Storm Water Management) limits impervious coverage to 25% of the area <br />12 <br />of the portion of a shoreland parcel that is above the OHWL.The subject property includes about <br />13 <br />12,425 square feet of land area above the OWHL; the 25% limit would allow up to about 3,100 <br />14 <br />square feet of impervious coverage on this property.This is a lower limit for impervious surfaces <br />15 <br />than non-shoreland parcels, and it is intended to further minimize impacts to public waters <br />16 <br />caused by storm runoff.Further, §1004.08 was recently amended to recognize that increased <br />17 <br />impervious coverage may be allowed on shoreland parcels, if approved in the variance process <br />18 <br />and if certain measures are taken to ensure the marginal storm water is managed before it reaches <br />19 <br />the adjacent lake. <br />20 <br />The proposed porch roof would be about 40 –50 feet from the OHWL, depending on where the <br />21 <br />measurement is taken, which is up to about 35feet closer than the code allows.The proposed <br />22 <br />patio area beneath the porch roof is about the same distance from the OHWL, which exceeds the <br />23 <br />pertinent minimum setback requirement, and the proposed modifications in the rear of the house <br />24 <br />would not cause impervious coverage on the property to exceed 25% of the parcel area. The <br />25 <br />proposed, future driveway addition in the front of the property, however, wouldbring the total <br />26 <br />impervious coverage at that time to approximately 3,300 square feet which is about 27% of the <br />27 <br />parcel area. <br />28 <br />VA <br />ARIANCENALYSIS <br />29 <br />Section 1009.04Cof the City Code establishes a mandate that the Variance Board make five <br />30 <br />specific findings about a variance request as a prerequisite for approving the variance.Planning <br />31 <br />Division staff has reviewed the applicationand offers the following draft findings. <br />32 <br />a. <br />The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.The proposed porch roof and <br />33 <br />driveway addition bothrepresent continued investment in a residential property, as <br />34 <br />advocated bythe Comprehensive Plan, and if the storm water from the excess impervious <br />35 <br />coverage is properly mitigated, the improvements will not compromise the <br />36 <br />Comprehensive Plan’s goals of protecting the quality of surface waters. <br />37 <br />b. <br />The proposal is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning ordinances.Newer <br />38 <br />sections of the code allow openporches to extend significantly into required building <br />39 <br />setbacks without being considered encroachments because they do not contribute to the <br />40 <br />appearance of building mass, andupdated shoreland regulations might well treat open <br />41 <br />porches similarly.Moreover, the zoning code establishesthe ability for shoreland parcels <br />42 <br />to exceed 25% impervious coverage, provided that the marginal storm water is properly <br />43 <br />mitigated. <br />44 <br />PF16-025_RVBA_20160914 <br />Page 2of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.