Laserfiche WebLink
�+�here tl�e �t��li�l� sttsnd�rds prohibit it, but tlle size of��ara�e tltat ca�i be b�tilt on the <br />._ subject prope�-t}° erce�ds tlzat ���hich needs relief #"ram the variance process. <br />� e. Despite bein� a shorelanci 104, the property does not l�ave unic�ue circtamstanees that <br />relate to increased �ara�e size. <br />,:> f. T'he variance, if granted, v�rould alter the essential character of the locality. Other large <br />..- �arages are present in the area, even those tllat are detac�ed and �lear the street, }JLIi 'Gl�l�ile <br />same appear t� approach the 1,008 sc�uare-foot limit. Planning Division scaff does not <br />- �►ave recorci of a}�pra��als for lar�er structures. <br />�Q'�` THEREFOKE BE �T RESOLVED, b�� the Roseville Varianee: B�ard, to deny t�1e <br />a: rec�,uest�;d variance to � 100-�.02 of the City Code, based on th� praposed �lan and the testin�ony <br />-,_ offered at the public hearing. <br />4= "The mazi�on for t�e adoption of the fore�oin�, resolution �r�as duly� seconc�ed by Variaelce <br />- Board Member Muphy and upan vate being taken thereon, the fo�lo�t in� voted in favor: Gjtzen, <br />_ Murph} . and I7aire; <br />and raoz�e vc�t�d agait7st; <br />4� W'I�EREU�'OV �aic� resolution «°as declared c�uly passed and adopted. <br />Pa�e 2 of � <br />