My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
EDA_Minutes_2016_08_29
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
EDA_Minutes_2016_08_29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2016 3:23:21 PM
Creation date
9/20/2016 3:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RHRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Monday, August 29, 2016 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />looking for affordable, workforce housing stock, Member Willmus reiterated <br />his preference for ownership components. <br /> <br />Member Etten noted previous discussions of the RHRA about land trusts as an <br />example that could provide affordable ownership for families. However, <br />Member Etten questioned whether a developer would bring such an idea to the <br />REDA, or if the city would need to seek that option on its own. <br /> <br />As far as priority ranking, Member Laliberte noted she had ranked it fairly low. <br />Member Laliberte noted that ranking was based on many comments made to <br />her in the past concerning density factors when projects come forward as high- <br />rise or multi-family housing. Member Laliberte agreed with Member Willmus <br />that there was not need for more of those; and noted that single-family homes <br />provided sufficient turnover to create starter homes in some wage brackets. <br />However, Member Laliberte opined there was a need to make sure that level <br />retained its value and proved inviting for those moving into the community, <br />whether or not it required prioritization. <br /> <br />In terms of providing assistance, President Roe suggested the REDA focus on <br />housing areas in their market study that identified a particular need in the <br />community. While opining luxury housing and subsidies didn’t go well <br />together, President Roe spoke in support of workforce housing. While <br />supporting ownership possibilities, President Roe noted the need to be <br />cognizant of the marketplace that continued to trend toward rentals, therefore <br />he didn’t want to exclude rentals. In SE Roseville where there was already <br />fairly dense housing, President Roe stated his preference would move toward <br />rehabilitation of existing buildings, since no new project had come forward in <br />that area in years. While some existing buildings provide affordable housing, <br />President Roe noted some barely got by condition-wise, and suggested if the <br />REDA wanted to provide high-quality workforce housing, it support those <br />rehabilitations. President Roe agreed creative ideas were good, but opined he <br />didn’t want to not consider multi-family either at market rate versus luxury. <br />President Roe also spoke in support of affordable senior housing. <br /> <br />Member Willmus agreed with President Roe when looking at established areas, <br />suggesting the policy be crafted around providing assistance to restore, <br />rehabilitate or replace, but move away from new HDR. <br /> <br />Member McGehee concurred with Member Willmus, also supporting <br />rehabilitation components. However, if the REDA supports more rentals, <br />Member McGehee reminded the REDA that most all the condominiums in the <br />community started out as apartments, and were not well-built, now creating <br />huge issues with that construction and buildings now serving not as they were <br />originally intended. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.