EDA_Minutes_2016_08_29 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RHRA Meeting Minutes – Monday, August 29, 2016 Page 24 sense to remove a parcel from city tax rolls and no longer generating tax revenue for the broader community without a clear purpose in mind, or if simply for open space and access to a county park. President Roe noted similarities with this parcel to that property purchased by the city across from City Hall for future consideration. While it took the property off the tax rolls, President Roe noted it wasn’t generating much now; and while access may be the goal, the existing structure would need to be torn down at city expense to avoid any adverse activities occurring in the structure. Given the reasonable price of the parcel, President Roe opined the parcel had potential to get into the development process if the 210 parcel or parcels south or west of parcel 196 develop and therefore he considered its purchase a potential benefit for the city. At the request of Member Willmus, Ms. Kelsey clarified that the city had not yet formally retracted its offer for the 210 parcel; but suggested doing so if that was their intent to provide a clear understanding to the current property owner. Member Willmus stated he’d be in favor of not retracting the offer now and leaving it on the table, based on his understanding the family was still trying to determine what direction to go. Member Etten stated he was fine leaving the offer on the table for the 210 parcel for now; but was concerned with the 196 parcel if used simply to provide a crossing to the park at this point with no striped or signed crossing, and at a significant and dangerous curve in the road at that site, he wouldn’t encourage that idea. Member Etten noted an existing crossing was available one-half block away to the west and much more visible. Member McGehee stated she was happy to change her position based on this discussion. However, Member McGehee stated she’d also be happy to turn it back and let it go on the market for a new house there, opining it was a nice lot and location. Public Comment Sherry Sanders, S McCarrons Boulevard Ms. Sanders stated her agreement with Member Etten, especially with the location of the 196 lot in proximity to the existing marked crosswalk providing better vision. Ms. Sanders opined it didn’t make sense to remove this parcel from tax rolls. Discussion ensued regarding past experience and the process for the city in acquiring the Hamline Avenue parcel for the REDA single-family home program and demolishing the existing home and preparing the site for new construction, with some funds still available to do so; and typical loss to the city related to demolishing existing structures and preparing the lot, while