EDA_Minutes_2016_08_29 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RHRA Meeting Minutes – Monday, August 29, 2016 Page 31 Ms. Sanders agreed with Mr. Moncur and encouraged the city to spend funds to evaluate the building as a first step before even approaching anyone for partnerships or other uses. Robin Schroeder, N McCarrons Boulevard In full disclosure, Ms. Schroeder serves as Chair of the City of Roseville’s Finance Commission, but spoke tonight as a Roseville resident. As a resident of SE Roseville, Ms. Schroeder noted the neighbors were concerned about what could happen on this site; and stated they were concerned with and asked that no more HDR or high-rise apartments be constructed on the site. Ms. Schroeder opined it was important for the EDA to map that future use, however, whether for park space or single-family residential. Ms. Schroeder asked that the City Council how they wanted the site to redevelop and to do so in the right time, by taking time, and if necessary seek an extension in order to evaluate the future of the site. Member Willmus stated he continued to struggle with the ultimate price tag for the property. While recognizing many in the community may be saying this would be a great building to retain as is, based on a greater fear of what it could become, Member Willmus stated that was his reason in wanting to consider potential rezoning. Knowing the dollars involved and reality of the difficulty the city would have in making the current facility work, Member Willmus admitted his struggle with this property. Willmus moved, Roe seconded, directing staff to NOT pursue acquisition of 211 N McCarrons Boulevard; and further directing staff to initiate a community-based rezoning process to survey members of that area as to what they would like to see that property zoned going forward. In defense of the motion, Member Willmus opined the city needed to be prudent in the steps taken and realize the timeline it was under. Therefore, Member Willmus opined the city should take action to implement steps to garner feedback from the broader community, as mentioned by Ms. Schroeder, about what they wanted or didn’t want on the site. Member Willmus stated a zoning conversation could accomplish that task. While the city could throw $20,000 here and there, Member Willmus noted it was already known the incredible burden acquisition costs would place on the community to get this to work. Member McGehee spoke in opposition to the motion for the simple reason, as long as she had sat on this City Council, she had seen enough expenditures without a particular direction or input far exceeding this outlay now before them, outlays that had placed incredible burdens on the community and