Laserfiche WebLink
RHRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Monday, August 29, 2016 <br />Page 35 <br /> <br />As seconder of the motion, President Roe responded that, yes it was, and could <br />be done with a process similar to that used when rezoning the Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment Area, with at least one discussion laying out options, and then <br />considering different segments versus the whole and providing an opportunity <br />for input. <br /> <br />However, President Roe stated that wouldbe his estimation in supporting the <br />current motion, since the City Council directs the Planning Commission on <br />public hearings for any rezoning and comprehensive plan designation <br />prompted by the city. President Roe noted that would involve an open house, <br />not just a public hearing, However, President Roe opined an open house would <br />be totally inadequate for this issue, and should be a more involved process. <br />President Roe also noted the difference in a consultant-driven or facilitated <br />discussion versus the Twin Lakes model that was staff-driven. <br /> <br />President Roe further noted a difference in this situation and previous <br />appraisals on property ordered by the city, was that those properties had <br />already been identified as part of the Park Renewal Program and funded <br />through that park bonding program. While this was an opportunity for the city, <br />President Roe opined that the rest of the pieces were not available to take <br />advantage of the opportunity at this time. President Roe further opined that his <br />understanding of the School District’s point of view and even having that <br />additional community conversation would get the city past this initial concern. <br /> <br />Member Laliberte requested amendment to the motion, for clarification and <br />agreed to by the maker and seconder of the motion, restated as follows: <br />Willmus moved, Roe seconded, directing staff to NOT pursue acquisition of <br />211 N McCarrons Boulevard; and further directing staff to initiate a full <br />community engagement as outlined broadly in this discussion for a <br />community-based rezoning process to survey members of that area as to <br />what they would like to see that property zoned going forward. <br /> <br />Ayes: <br />Willmus, Roe, Laliberte, and Etten <br />Nays: <br />McGehee. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />10.Adjourn <br />Willmus moved, Laliberte seconded, adjourning the meeting at approximately 8:28 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />Ayes: <br />McGehee, Willmus, Roe, Laliberte, and Etten <br />Nays: <br />None. <br />Motion carried. <br />